Russia Initiates a New Nuclear Arms Race

Reuters reports (hat tip: TakeYourCross):

Russia hopes to deploy a new nuclear missile next year designed to penetrate anti-missile defenses and will build eight submarines to carry it, defense officials said on Thursday.

The latest statements underline Moscow’s determination to upgrade its nuclear strike forces on land, sea and air. They are regarded by Russian commanders as the cornerstone of the country’s defenses.

Colonel-General Vladimir Popovkin, head of armaments for the Russian armed forces, told the Defense Ministry newspaper “Red Star” that Russia’s recent war with Georgia “compels us to rethink the current state of the armed forces and how they should develop further.”

President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have both pledged to extend Russia’s recent military build-up with extra funds to buy new, high-tech arms. On Wednesday, Putin announced an extra $3.1 billion of spending next year, partly to replace equipment lost in the Georgia war.

Despite the billions of dollars spent on them since Putin came to power as president in 2000, Russia’s 1 million-strong armed forces remain poorly equipped, badly paid and reliant on a large proportion of unwilling conscripts.

The deputy commander in chief of the Russian navy, Admiral Alexander Tatarinov, said on Thursday that by 2015 Moscow would build a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines to carry a new, nuclear-capable strategic missile.

“The navy has gone over to building ships and nuclear submarines by the batch,” Tatarinov told Interfax news agency.

“A new state armaments program includes a plan to build a batch of eight nuclear submarines that would be armed with new Bulava strategic missiles.”


Defense analysts based in Moscow say much of the extra spending has not reached the front line because of corruption or mismanagement and many weapons programs are running late.

One of these is the Bulava, a submarine-launched long-range nuclear missile which Putin says will be capable of penetrating any missile defenses — a reference to Washington’s plans for a new global system to shoot down hostile rockets.

The Bulava, a modified version of the land-based Topol-M, has had a checkered history with several test launch failures and is running at least two years late.

The navy pronounced the latest Bulava exercise on September 18 a success, saying the missile flew from the White Sea across Russia to the Far East.

Popovkin, who is also deputy defense minister, said he hoped the armed forces would accept the Bulava for service next year. Upgrading Russia’s strategic nuclear forces remained a priority because they were the cornerstone of its defenses, he said.

“As long as we are a nuclear power, no hotheads will venture to attack our country,” Popovkin said in the interview.

” … We have already this year started fitting out strategic nuclear forces with the Topol-M missile,” he added.

Russia also plans to modernize its nuclear-capable Tupolev TU-160 supersonic strategic bombers and to fully commission the first nuclear-powered submarine to carry the Bulava missile, he added.

The submarine, the Yuri Dolgoruky, was launched in February, six years after its original scheduled date, though it still lacks the missiles it was designed to carry.

5 responses to “Russia Initiates a New Nuclear Arms Race

  1. Do they really want to spend so much money?
    Can they?

  2. Russia has no other option than to invest in the nuclear forces. In conventional arms the Russians are hopelessly behind the West by some 20-30 years of development.

  3. Can you back that up? 20 to 30 years? So the mods they are putting in the Flankers is circa 1978 tech? Please do everyone a favour and instead of spouting the general they are behind the west, get some good technical books on Russian equipment and you’ll find areas they are ahead in, parity with and yes behind in some areas.

  4. According to the Russian defector Col. Stanislav Lunev, formerly of the GRU, it is a core assumption of Russian military doctrine that nuclear weapons are for practical use (against America in particular), not only for deterrence.

    See his book, “Through the Eyes of the Enemy”, as well as his 1996 Jamestown Foundation article “The Enduring Power of the GRU”.

  5. Bob, your not the general looking for areas of improvement are you, that would just be pathetic.

    If your not, looking for new ideas to enhance soviet, I mean russian capabilities is just as pathetic.

    I can give you a hint, the Sovi, er Russians have not had a real technilogical advance since Vietnam. Which was countered in a few short years.

    Happy hunting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s