EDITORIAL: Appeasement and Shame in Yaroslavl


Appeasement and Shame in Yaroslavl

Sergei Mitrokhin. Leonid Gozman. Do you know those names?

Mitrokhin is the obscure leader of the obscure Yabloko party established by Gigori Yavlinsky, and Gozman is the even more obscure leader of the even more obscure Right Cause party, successor to the Union of Right Forces established by Boris Nemtsov.

Neither gentleman plays any significant role in the current Russian opposition movement led by Boris Nemtsov and Garry Kasparov. Neither party holds as much as a single seat in the Russian legislature.  So naturally, both were invited to the Kremlin’s sham “modernization” conference in Yaroslavl last week (200 miles north of — that is, very far from — Moscow) so the Kremlin could prove how liberal and open and democratic it is.   Neither offered any serious direct criticism of Putin or challenged his authority in any way.

Neither Kasparov nor Nemtsov nor any other serious opposition figure, of course, was on the guest list.  And, of course, the Americans on hand did not say a single word about their absence.

These sham proceedings, this Potemkin Village of democracy, is an outraged, and we condemn it.  Even more strongly, we condemn the participation of Americans like Michael McFaul and William Burns, who are allowing themselves to be used as pawns in Vladimir Putin‘s KGB propaganda game.  These proceedings continue the repression of democracy in Russia, they do nothing to roll it back.

McFaul and Burns are lending credibility to the insane, duplicitous ramblings of Dima Medvedev, who stated:  “Revisionist forces have not achieved power in Russia.”  The KGB has a choke hold on power. If that is not a revisionist force, what is? By allowing these shameless lies, these deluded ravings, to go unchallenged, the Obama administration is furthering the cause of dictatorship in Russia.

Obama’s predecessor, George Bush, said that he’d looked into Putin’s eyes, glimpsed his soul, and found him trustworthy.  Bush invited war criminal Vladimir Shamanov to the White House for a photo opportunity.  In response, Obama said he would “reset” relations with Russia, but as we see it Obama has only given us more of the same.  Just like Neville Chamberlain, Obama is prepared to respond to the threat of dictatorship only with appeasement.  He will fail just as spectacularly, and the world will pay just as high a price.

6 responses to “EDITORIAL: Appeasement and Shame in Yaroslavl

  1. In case you haven’t noticed, neither Nemtsov or Kasparov are of any influence in Russia, either. They don’t matter. One bit. No popular support. Barely any name-recognition. Nada.

  2. They don’t have any support or name recognition, and their ideas are not known because they have been largely purged from the media by the state power.

    • Complete BS.

      For example, they have every mean of getting support via livejournal (I make an example of just one site, just one media channel). There are 7 million users of internet in Moscow only, and they are potential blog readers.

      Still they get 3,000 people coming to dissenters marches.

      This is a very obvious fail for any politician in any country to be able to recruit less than 0.05% of reachable audience. This means actually nobody cares about him.

      Though as a political project for abroad it is fairly successful, if you take into account number of articles written about Kasparov and Nemtsov during the Putin’s years and later.

  3. No argument here. The point was that while the ‘opposition’ folks elevated by Putin & Co. may be insignificant, so are Nemtsov and Kasparov. There is no opposition ‘movement’ of any import in Russia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s