Neo-Sovietizing Boris Nemtsov

Top Russia blogger Vladimir Kara-Murza reports:

For Yuri Andropov, who headed the KGB from the 1960s to the 1980s, suppressing political dissent was a top priority. “Every such act represents a danger,” he told his colleagues in 1979, “The struggle against them must be decisive, uncompromising, and merciless.” The regime tried different approaches. Dissidents were convicted to long sentences for “anti-Soviet agitation”—an offense under Article 70 of the penal code—and sent away to prisons and labor camps alongside real criminals. Often, they were labelled “insane,” committed to special psychiatric prisons and subjected to torturous “treatment.” Both of these practices—criminal convictions and “punitive psychiatry”—met with worldwide condemnation and ultimately proved too costly for the Kremlin’s international image.

Then Andropov had an idea.

Instead of persecuting opponents inside the country, he would expel them abroad, reducing international criticism but achieving the same goal: ridding the country of “troublemakers” who spoke out against totalitarianism, staged public protests, initiated petition campaigns, produced literary and political samizdat. Starting with the deportation of Alexander Solzhenitsyn in 1974, and Vladimir Bukovsky in 1976, Moscow increasingly turned to this strategy to deprive the anticommunist movement of its leading participants. Alexander Ginzburg, Eduard Kuznetsov, Yuri Orlov, Anatoly Sharansky, and others soon followed. Many more were pressured into emigrating (like Pavel Litvinov and Natalia Gorbanevskaya) or stripped of their citizenship while on a visit abroad (like Mstislav Rostropovich and General Petro Grigorenko).

It seems that Andropov’s favored practice has returned.

On July 5, the Federal Bailiff Service of the Russian Federation issued an order prohibiting Russia’s opposition leader and former deputy prime minister Boris Nemtsov from leaving the country. The decision was taken at the request of natural gas trader Gennady Timchenko, whom Nemtsov had accused of profiting from his connections to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. A Moscow judge had ordered Nemtsov to publish a retraction, which he did—but, according to Timchenko and the Federal Bailiff Service, with an “incorrect” title (in fact, the long, court-ordered title was simply preceded by a shorter version). The travel ban was made public while Nemtsov was attending the European Parliament’s session in Strasbourg—with the apparent aim of forcing him to stay abroad. He returned to Moscow regardless, and the international scandal over the decision, which was condemned both at the European Parliament’s meeting and at US Congressional hearings, forced the Russian authorities to rescind it, with a clumsy explanation that it had been issued “prematurely.”

But as soon as the opposition leader was back in Moscow, a group of State Duma deputies made a fresh move. In an official statement, Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s LDPR party—the third-largest group in the lower house of Parliament—proposed “stripping [Nemtsov] of his Russian citizenship” and “deporting him to the USA … where he will be greeted with open arms.” For all his clownish image, Zhirinovsky is known as the Kremlin’s public opinion “tester”—previously, proposals such as replacing elected governors with appointees or switching to party list–only parliamentary elections were sounded by LDPR before becoming government policy.

It is worth noting that, largely as a reaction to Soviet history, Russia’s 1993 Constitution specifically prohibits the authorities from removing anyone’s citizenship (Article 6.3) or deporting a Russian citizen to another country (Article 61.1). But provisions of the Constitution have long been treated in Moscow as recommendations at best. The move against Nemtsov came just weeks after the Justice Ministry denied registration and ballot access to his Popular Freedom Party (PFP). According to the latest poll conducted by the independent Levada Center, 37 percent of Russians want the government to register the PFP and allow it to contest December’s parliamentary elections (29 percent are against, 34 are undecided).

It comes as no news that Vladimir Putin takes cues from Yuri Andropov. The Russian premier never hid his admiration for his former KGB boss; one of Putin’s first actions in office in 1999 was to restore a memorial plaque to Andropov (a “distinguished political figure”) on Moscow’s Lubianka Square. Like Andropov, Putin is afraid of dissent. Like Andropov, he will ultimately fail to keep it under the lid. Seven years after Yuri Andropov’s death, the totalitarian system he tried so hard to protect crumbled in a few August days.

7 responses to “Neo-Sovietizing Boris Nemtsov

  1. Russian opposition,I think can be devided into the “liberal empire” or “socialist empire” supporters.Their future policies are easily predictable.

    • Russian nationalist

      Ben, I am afraid it’s not true. Even the “liberal wing” of the opposition is not homogenous. For example compare Yavlinsky and Nemtsov. Definitely you can’t argue that Yavlinsky is among “liberal empire” camp.
      Let alone a number of the political forces like the National Democratic Alliance of the Russian nationalists (Alexei Shiropayev) who support desovetization and deimperialization of Russia.

  2. RN! “deimperialisation” of Russia can`t be realized by nationalists.For example: there are 43% of Russians and 48% of Tatars in Tatarstan(imperial rulers have known their job).

  3. Russian nationalist

    Ben. Russian nationalists (like Russian liberals) are a very diverse crowd. Nationalism is about PEOPLE not a state as such. Nationalism is not equal to imperialism.
    If we presume the ultimate value of people (not territory) then we have everything in place. That is why Russian nationalists I represent recognise Tatars’ right for realisation of their own nationalism.
    We wish to live on our own WITHOUT burden of the imperial heritage. Without Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis etc. If you noticed the ethnic Russians don’t have their own national entity as other peoples of the RF have.

  4. Russian nationalist

    “Seven years after Yuri Andropov’s death, the totalitarian system he tried so hard to protect crumbled in a few August days”.
    History repeats itself: first as tragedy, then as farce. Putin’s junta is a farce with tragic overtones though. Anyway, Kara-Murza, like real Captain Obvious refers to apparent regimes’ weakness and instability. This instability is due to the dual nature of Putin’s policies – you can’t conduct colonial, occupational policies suppressing ethnic Russian population and make people love you. Like old Russian-Jewish joke goes – “you had better either take your crucifix down or put your pants on (to hide the circumcised penis)”. LOL

  5. Pingback: Alexander (Alik) Ilyich Ginzburg – Александр Ильич Гинзбург | Seit über 10.000 Jahren Erfahrung in Versklavung

  6. aoewgndim fskcwgwmino wtcvqywq

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s