Can Craven Russians face up to their Past?

Maxim Trudolyubov, opinion page editor of Vedomosti, writing in the Moscow Times:

At least 70 years after millions of people fell victim to political repression, Russia has yet to come to terms with the crimes of its Soviet past. In fact, it even seems as if nobody really wants to discuss the subject and that it has been imposed on us by some overly clever person or ill-intentioned foreigner.

But it is increasingly rare that foreigners are interested in this topic. And with so many conflicting emotions involved, many Russians continue to feel that the issue divides rather than unites society. This is not because there are so many hard-core supporters of former Soviet leader Josef Stalin, but because a significant portion of the population believes that condemning the crimes of the Soviet regime somehow reflects negatively on themselves, their parents or the older generation, and places a dark cloud over more positive memories from that period. Another factor is the traditional mistrust that some members of society feel toward the educated class, “liberals,” “reformers” and human rights activists who are typically associated with this subject.

These feelings would eventually disappear if no special effort were made to cultivate them. Unfortunately, Kremlin spin doctors have long cultivated a juvenile attitude that says, “Europe cannot condemn us for Stalinism when the German SS was guilty of comparable crimes.”

The West is now too preoccupied with its own problems to bother preaching to other countries. And anyway, it is not so important what others say about Russia. The problem of past Soviet wrongdoings is primarily a domestic Russian problem. The best approach for Russia to take is not to stage vigils but to prove to the world through its actions that it is learning the necessary lessons from its past.

The memory of our Soviet past should not be static but active. It should be reflected in both the public and political life of the country. Russia is permeated with signs of its Soviet past. There is plenty of work for everyone to do in perpetuating the memory of those killed and in designating historical sites connected with those events. Only in rare cases does a memorial plaque grace the many buildings, streets, canals, factories and mines built by prisoners of that era. In many cities, streets still bear the names of Soviet leaders, and sometimes, the executioners (often the same person).

That situation should be rectified quickly, or at least some form of explanatory note should be appended to existing signs. The locations of many executions and burials have not yet been found. Millions of people still do not know where their relatives are buried. To this day, Russia has only regional and private museums chronicling state terror but not a single museum of national status. Many of the names of the repressed remain unknown. The “Victims of Political Repression of the Soviet Union” database compiled by the Memorial organization and published at includes about 2.6 million names. Speaking at an international “History of Stalinism” conference, Memorial chairman Arseny Roginsky said, “At the current rate of work, it would take several more decades to make a complete list.”

To take a wider view of reconstructing Russia’s attitude toward its past, the state should fulfill its obligation to people living in hardship conditions — and especially those in single-industry towns. Those difficult living conditions are a result of the forced urbanization and industrialization that the Soviet state accomplished by borrowing against the future. Now the government should make good on that debt. What’s more, it is intolerable that corrupt authorities use the judicial and law enforcement systems to enrich themselves through illegal seizures of property when so many people previously fell victim to that same system for political reasons. Law enforcement and judicial reforms are therefore fitting tribute to the memory of those victims.

Respect for human dignity is also fitting tribute because the first step of political repression was to eliminate that dignity. Any form of government that is based on a disregard for human dignity should be considered unacceptable.

And let us not forget that it was not an occupying force or a foreign power that committed those crimes of repression. This was Russians killing Russians on a massive scale, in numbers that even now are difficult to reckon. It is difficult to accept this fact, as Roginsky also mentioned in his speech. He said, “When we remember the terror, we are unable to assign the principle role and incapable of using the pronoun ‘we’ in place of ‘they.’”

But every victim of repression always had a very specific understanding of who perpetrated the crime against them — either the person who carried out the order, those who were responsible for fulfilling the latest “quota,” the authorities who created the quota, or those at the top who established the policy of quotas and repression in the first place. Those who committed the crimes had one thing in common: They were all political leaders and functionaries of the state. The state itself was the main culprit. A full reckoning with the Soviet past should begin by acknowledging the criminality of the state. But, as Roginsky pointed out, recognizing this fact is difficult for a political system that insists on the infallibility of those in authority. This in part explains Russia’s strange “memory lapse,” its lack of a national museum of state terror, why it rewrites textbooks and straddles the fence by admitting that there were victims of repression while ignoring the existence of a perpetrator of those crimes.

That is a mistake. Acknowledging the crimes of the Soviet state does not mean an end to the Russian state. Rather, it would mark the beginning. Such recognition could serve as the moral basis for the fight against corruption, for government reforms and for the general improvement of the country. “We” and “they” — that is, we the people and they the government — are still locked in a conflict that cannot be resolved until we come to terms with our Soviet past.

8 responses to “Can Craven Russians face up to their Past?

  1. Anonymous Infidel

    All it is is a theory, but I believe that the only reason Russians have little to no interest in the butchery of the Soviet Union, is that they believe, because it expanded a Russian Empire to it’s peak, it is a good thing unthinkable to condemn or even examine critically.

    • The only reason is the same why you don’t say “sorry” to every black person you randomly encounter.

      It’s not you have little to no interest in the butchery in Africa and slavery in the US, it’s not you think slavery was super for your country.

      It’s just you live in XXI century. And all the “sorrys” are said, and the situation has changed since those times.

      • Dymasza,
        Leave Africa and US slaver in peace. What I am going to say will be probably beyond your comprehension – but try to follow my way of reasoning. If Russians have any self respect and common sense they would deal with the attrocities committed by their own Russian compatriots for their own good. Why? Because Russians are being seen as a truly slaves, with no dignity, no self-respect – the Russian authorities spit at you and the Russian people are saying that it’s just raining
        That’s why the rest of the world has a total contempt for you.

  2. Until the moskovites admit to the atrocities commited by ; white ,
    red , or ony other russia , they can not move forward with their
    history . And until they ATONE for those artrocities to their victoms ,
    they can not hope to earn the respect of and be accepted as equals by
    the rest of the world . It is really as simple as that .

    • Max, why do you Uke nationalists always run around bare-assed, beg for cheap gas, and still try to prove you are the victims?

      You, Uke’s nationalists, destroyed virtually every production facility you inherited from the USSR.

      You made your population dwindle at the highest rate in Europe, and it’s still dwindling.

      You failed to create any resemblance of a nation united around common values.

      And yet the poor old bullfrog Ukraine can’t fly up in the sky solely because of the Moscovites?

      Хоче полетiти,
      Тихо каже “Ква!”
      Але в небо взмити.
      Hе дає Москва???

    • Manfred Steifschwanz

      How touching, buddy. Who would have thought the upper echelons of Western society were such merciful, altruistic philanthropists? OK, never mind Western imperialism’s bloody legacy of unbridled looting, genocide, and environmental destruction worldwide to this day. The particular problem in Russia’s case is that her latest encounter with your revered Western Corporate Gangster Cabal ruling the planet is too recent to be that easily forgotten. It brought utter squalor and destruction to Russia, just as it did in the periods of 1918-1920 and 1941-1945. Silly, arrogant Westerners are fully entitled in my view to enjoy their betters’ charming little masquerade where they parade as “The International Community”. Better believe me, since I am myself a Westerner, speaking most of the main European languages fluently at that. You should be somewhat embarrassed by this fact. I mean, if you cannot take a high educated Westerner’s consent for granted — imagine then how you might fare among non-Western folks.

  3. Well said and to the point aaausa & Maksym, but totally wasted on the likes of dimwit dima, and et al!

    Sadly, that’s a big negative for democracy, where Russian “und krank in der kopf DDR – Manfred” lying scoundrels can spread their sick propaganda ad nauseam ; but just you try and write the truth in their trash rag – “Pravda” too see how far you get with your comment?

    Best of “British luck” guys!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s