Babitsky on Chechnya

Persecuted Russian hero journalist Andrei Babitsky, writing on Prague Watchdog:

To sum up the results of a series of actions is the easiest thing to do, because the actions contain links that demonstrate tendencies, they hide the codes of a future that has not yet been fully revealed, but can be guessed. To analyze a void is not more difficult – it is not possible at all. A vacuum is aggressively silent, sending in response to all questions a guarded “I wasn’t here, am not here now, and won’t be here in the future.” Nevertheless, the upside of what happens when a void gapes in the space that is organized by human activity is that by its silence it exposes the poverty and futility of articulation.

When it became clear that Medvedev would be appointed in place of his predecessor, hope began to dawn in the camp of the people who hated Kadyrov. A group made up of former and current parliamentary deputies, Kadyrov’s opponents in the Kremlin and the law enforcement structures, immediately began to intensify its efforts. In the absence of other candidates, the anti-Kadyrov lobby gathered around the Yamadayev brothers, who were to bring about the overthrow of the Kadyrov clan in the Moscow’s corridors of power.

At the time, there was persistent talk about how Medvedev could not abide Kadyrov, how he found the political regime that had established itself in Chechnya deeply abhorrent. After the Russian presidential elections it appears that somehow the lobbyists managed to break their way into the Kremlin. They claimed that the Kremlin fully understood the need for a change of government in the republic. However, they did not have the necessary means with which to make that change. They would have to wait a year or so, they said, until Medvedev had built his own government machine, and only then would it be possible for them to go into battle with open visors. “At all events,” men like ex-deputy Frants Klintsevich proclaimed without a flicker of doubt, “the fate of the criminal upstart who has crushed the republic under him is sealed in advance.”

And now it is the first anniversary of Dmitry Medvedev’s presidency. Because the timing of Kadyrov’s political death has been determined only approximately, we may, of course, assume that the current Russian president has some leeway before he needs to carry out the termination of the fringe dweller of Khosi-Yurt. But even in this space of time a certain combination of pieces has developed in the political chess-game, allowing us to draw specific conclusions.

So what are the results of all the hard work the Kremlin’s new master has done in relation to Chechnya? First of all, Ruslan Yamadayev, the only candidate who might have been considered a possible replacement for Kadyrov, has been killed. That complicates the situation, of course, but Medvedev’s dislike of Kadyrov (if he has ever felt it) cannot not simply be expected to go down like a benign swelling. In other words, something has to be done with Putin’s front man, who is demonstrating a flagrant disregard for the rule of law that Medvedev has undertaken to restore.

But no, we can confidently state that during the “Medvedev” year Kadyrov’s position in Chechnya has only grown stronger. What is more, he has succeeded in increasing the spread of repression and violence on an almost planetary scale. In a sense, the killings in Europe, Turkey, the UAE are Kadyrov’s personal stamp on the forehead of the “legalist” Medvedev: “You’re a nobody.” And the elegant flourish belowr the brutal inscription reads: “V. Putin.”

An almost demonstrative disregard for Putin’s “heir” is the current Chechen government’s most typical characteristic. It is highly probable that last year the anti-Kadyrov lobby indulged in wishful thinking, and that Medvedev’s complaints about Kadyrov were no more than a fantasy. But in the end no one has marked out the borders of the “void” that emerged in the Kremlin after the elections as clearly as Kadyrov has done..

All the loyalty solely to Putin, all the baseness of the patriotic slogans and flattery, the press conferences in Grozny after the visits to Moscow – about Kadyrov’s meetings with Putin… While all that Medvedev gets from Kadyrov are some routine mentions of his name in formal official communiqués. Foreign observers could see what was going on: the simple-minded Kadyrov was playing the role of a finger pointing to the lack of power in the Kremlin corridors, from which the strength was draining dry. But simple-mindedness of this kind was bound to cause fluctuations (or at least resentment) in the depths of the Kremlin’s vacuum: “How can this be? This man is violating all the norms of decency by refusing to follow the nominal logic of the Table of Ranks.”

There was no resentment, no dissatisfaction. As though it were not all an improvisation, but events were strictly following a pre-written script, as though Kadyrov had been issued special orders so that no one would start to have doubts about who really governed Russia. The signifier became part of the plan as a constant value, while the signified had no right to feel any emotions, because he had been informed of the agenda in advance.

The “Medvedev” year has also revealed the stylistic inconsistency of the resident of the Kremlin’s now lacklustre chambers in its Caucasus annex. Kadyrov is of course bloody and bad. However, his bloody activism is a secondary matter dependent on other factors, and determined by them. All the visible space behind it is covered by a greater evil, which is the imperative and the higher justification for the blood.

It sometimes appears that all of Kadyrov’s excesses — the horses, the expensive cars, the hundred dollar bills scattered above the heads of guests – are a cry of despair from a man who senses his own artificiality and complete vulnerability in the face of a terrible, cold power, the power of the highest ruler, who only needs to change the direction of his gaze for the insolent dzhigit to become a wet patch on the floor. All the crimes were devised and rationalized before Kadyrov – he is following a path that has already been laid down, and as he chews his pencil is carefully tracing the outline drawn in his student notebook by a cruel instructor.

The world has not changed by one iota, and throughout the year that has passed no leaf has stirred. The celestial ruler still sits on his lofty throne, observing the brawls of the wild aborigenes with the dispassionate curiosity of a natural scientist. In this observer’s presence Kadyrov is fated not to diverge even one millimetre from the destiny that has been allotted him. Where is the source of the will that preserves the unity of time, place and action for the little man whose hobby is racehorses? Certainly not in the Kremlin.

In Chechnya the joke is that if one day Putin were to wake up fifteen minutes later, Kadyrov’s corpse would already be going cold. This savage witticism brings out the essence of the Kremlin’s decadence. Dmitry Medvedev can stay awake for days and nights on end – on the fate of the young man from Khosi-Yurt it will have no effect whatsoever.

10 responses to “Babitsky on Chechnya

  1. Mister Babitsky should have a chat with Elena Masyuk. Another ardent defender of brave Chechen freedomfighters. She urinated on herself everytime she would talk about the fearless wahhabi mujahadin. That is until she went on a trip to Grozny and was thrown into a zindan. After being gang-raped by Chechens for a few weeks, she returned to Moscow. Since then as you can imagine her tone has changed a bit. The Chechens made a tape out of the gang-rapes and its still sold on markets in Grozny.


    Jerry, you’re a very rude guest. We have clearly posted rules regarding the allegation of fact, requiring that they be supported by links to published material to substantiate them. If you violate our rules in this regard again, you’ll be banned from further commenting on this blog.

    To respond to the substance of your “comment,” if there can be said to be any, there’s no doubt that the Chechens are guilty of acts of terrorism which should be condemned. Do you think that gives the Russian government the right to torture and murder innocent civilians? If you do, you’re a psychopath not speaking in Russia’s best interests.

    There’s equally no doubt that, unlike Russia, Chechnya is not an indepedent country — yet Russia, which is, has been found formally guilty of state-sponsored murder by the international court and has been repeatedly condemned by Amnesty International for its own barbaric acts of terrorism. And the Kremlin persecutes and murders journalists who dare to report on its barbarism, acting just like the worst of the Chechens. As such, Russia cannot claim to be a civilized nation, much less to membership on such lofty councils as the G-8.

    Apparently it’s difficult for you to comprehend, pea-brained imbecile that you are, but this blog isn’t about reform in Chechnya or in the USA. There are plenty of blogs devoted to that topic, if you’re interested in them, go read one. This blog is about reform in RUSSIA. So do try to remember that and discuss the actual topic rather than trying to change it to one you’re more comfortable with. Doing so is another quite rude thing you routinely do here.

    Your attempt at propaganda, in short, is just silly, ignorant and you ought to be ashamed of its vapid, unsubstantiated character to say nothing of its irrelevance.

    • Really?

      Seems the jury is still out on who actually kidnapped her, considering she was threatened just a few days before her kidnapping by the Russian military, I doubt it was by separatists.

      • Among the gangs of former guerrillas-turned-kidnappers were, for example, the future “hero of Russia” Sulim Yamadayev (last year he was officially federally wanted for kidnappings and murders in the late 1990s – and as a “wanted person” he was sent to fight the Georgians).

        The republic was completely ruined, no foreign aid whatsoever (in any form but helping to prepare the elctions) – Russia was not ruined at all, yet many Russian veterans of Afghanistan in Chechnya turned to crime back in Russia, too (and the same about the Afghan veterans of Afghanistan – civil-war era Afghanistan was plagued by gangs and unruly warlords, so the Taliban were at first hailed by the population for “restoring order”). Nothing strange here, Russia’s to blame – and the world too, for ignoring the issue (same with Afghanistan after the Soviet withdrawal, no Western interest).

        The separtist government tried to combat the gangs, even with such dreastic measures such as declaring marshal law and publicily executing several criminals by firing squad (which many in the world thought was “barbaric”). Shamil Basayev was involved in the fight against the kidnappers.

        As about the foreign aid, there was some effort from the IRC, but they ended their operations after a myserious attack by a band of killers that killed several western aid workers with silenced weapons. The man accused of organization of the attack, pseuo-“Islamic” gangster Adam Deniyev, fled to Russia
        and returned with the Russian tanks to become the “deputy head of Chechen administration” – the resistance killed him in 2000, on-air (killed while hosting an “Islamic” TV sermon – the “adminsitration head” Kadyrov Sr was killed on-air too, 4 years later).

        Russians also had their hand in several other attacks on the foreigners in the interwar period.

        • Oh, and Adam Deniyev also kidnapped Babitsky.

          That is, Babitsky was kidnapped by the Russian soldiers first, who then turned him-in to Deniyev (and even filmed and broadcasted this event!).

          The Independent in 2001 (not 2000, mea culpa):

          ” Nothing in his life became him like the leaving of it. Adam Deniyev finally got his 15 minutes of worldwide fame by being perhaps the first man to be blown up while recording a TV show. The deputy leader of the pro-Kremlin Chechen administration, he was widely held to be responsible for a wave of kidnappings in Chechnya, the murder of six Red Cross nurses in 1996 and the curious abduction of the Russian journalist Andrei Babitsky last year. Some Chechens might even nominate Deniyev’s death as their favourite TV moment.

          His killing on Thursday night, disclosed yesterday by the Kremlin, took place while he was being filmed reciting from the Koran on the roof of the TV station in Avtury in the south of the war-shattered country. It is further evidence that the Chechen guerrilla war is not over, despite repeated assertions by the Russian President, Vladimir Putin.”

  2. “After the murders of two of his brothers in the past year, Isa Yamadayev, 34, believes he is next on a death-list drawn up by powerful enemies of his family.”

  3. Of course Sulim is dead and Isa will follow him soon. His fight against Kadyrov is a senseless fight to death

    • And what would you do if you were a member of the Yamadayev clan now?

      • Well, you know you can’t run. Kadyrov will just hunt you down.
        No choice but to fight really.


        That’s an excellent point, and the same goes for Putin, doesn’t it?

  4. no Andrew,fighting Kadyrov is no alternative,because Kadyrov has 20-30.000 armed Kadyrovites. Isa Yamadayev has 3 or 4 bodyguards left!!! So what kind of fight do you mean,LOL???? If i were Isa Yamadayev,i would flee far away from russia,starting a new life. That´s the single possibility,that his four children will grow up with a father

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s