The Russian Army, Fading Away

Defense expert Alexander Golts, writing in the Moscow Times:

Every year, the Defense Ministry holds one of its most important conferences. At this annual event, in which all the generals are present and the president gives the key address, we usually learn details about new military reforms and weapons programs.

This year’s meeting, which took place on Nov. 11, was unlike any of the previous ones. First, President Dmitry Medvedev did not attend. Second, there was conspicuously little information released from the meeting. The only thing we know from a short, terse document that the Defense Ministry released after the meeting is that the number of officers will be reduced from 355,000 to 150,000 and the number of military educational institutions will be cut by 80 percent. In addition, the ministry announced that the elite Tamanskaya and Kantemirovskaya divisions as well as the 98th and 106th Airborne Divisions are scheduled to be disbanded in 2009.

The cardinal changes that are planned over the next three years are causing several hundred thousand military personnel to shake in their army boots. Back in Soviet times, the top brass would certainly have used its own media outlets to “explain” their strategy to the public. Of course, 80 percent of those plans consisted of little more than senseless jabber, but at least in this way rank and file soldiers had some idea of what awaited them in the near future.

It is not surprising that the military’s top brass has resisted the plan to institute huge cutbacks to the armed forces. And it will take some time before they can be sure that the would-be reformers have adequate political support to implement their planned changes. While that internal struggle plays out, the defense minister and president apparently prefer to remain quiet.

But there is a more important reason for their silence. The proposed cuts and reorganization are so significant that they will cause dramatic changes to not only the quantity but also the quality of the armed forces. I have already written in previous columns that the large reduction in the officer corps and the creation of a professional army effectively means the end of the mass mobilization army.

The head of the General Staff, Nikolai Makarov, and lawmakers from the State Duma and Federation Council have only recently learned of the reduction figures. There should now be only 1.7 million military personnel during wartime. In the event of a war, only 700,000 soldiers will be called to service instead of mobilizing several million reservists.

This means that the country no longer requires a huge pool of reservists. It also eliminates the need for conscription.

The authorities have apparently decided that they will either make drastic cutbacks to the conscription numbers in 2012 or eliminate conscription altogether. Which way will it go? Makarov gave us a clue when he recently said on television: “In 2012, 2013 and 2014 there will be a significant drop in demographics. … Our conscription pool is now only one-half of what it was in 2001. But we hope to double or triple the salaries of professional military personnel by that time to attract contract soldiers on that preferential basis and to put an end to that question.”

I suspect that the authorities would win the support of the people if they were to implement such a revolutionary reform. The fact that the leaders remain silent does little to mask the enormous commotion caused by these changes. As soon as the authorities begin to speak openly about a new military strategy and reorganization, it will be clear that it does not jibe with the aggressive rhetoric that we have heard so much from so many generals, as well as Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Medvedev.

The rejection of a mass mobilization army would essentially mean that the country’s leaders for all intents and purposes have acknowledged that Russia is fundamentally unable to counter NATO and “the U.S. aggressors.”

This also means that the only deterrent left for the country is its nuclear forces. As a result, the bar has been lowered for when nuclear weapons might be used. But this issue is largely academic since no one seriously believes that the Kremlin is ready or willing to launch a nuclear strike.

Judging by the planned military reforms, it is clear that the top brass in their heart of hearts do not consider the United States and NATO as serious threats to Russia’s security. But the leaders in the Kremlin and the Defense Ministry are not ready to admit it publicly, and that is why they remain silent about the reforms.

2 responses to “The Russian Army, Fading Away

  1. Adn what has this article got to do with russophobe. In fact it is a well written balanced article, without any of the vritiole of other articles posted here. In fact it seems teh defense ministry has finally got its ideas in order and will move its forces to purely contract soldiers. So this means Russias army will be smaller. It could also mean that it will be better motivated and effective, with more money to spend on new kit and training. You don’t need a big army to fight a war as the US has proved so at last Russia is seeing the light. Here’s to hoping they will pull it off.

    LA RUSSOPHOBE RESPONDS:

    So let’s see if we understant. You’re criticizing us for NOT posting vitriole?

    Where did you get your brain? K-mart? Was it a blue-light special?

    Here’s a clue you ape: The Kremlin doesn’t want its army to get smaller, it wants it to get bigger.

    If you actually read the article, you’d see the author note that “conspicuously little information released from the meeting” and “the number of military educational institutions will be cut by 80 percent” and “elite Tamanskaya and Kantemirovskaya divisions as well as the 98th and 106th Airborne Divisions are scheduled to be disbanded in 2009” and “the proposed cuts and reorganization are so significant that they will cause dramatic changes to not only the quantity but also the quality of the armed forces”. If you think this is positive new for Russia, you are a moron.

  2. “the country’s leaders for all intents and purposes have acknowledged that Russia is fundamentally unable to counter NATO and “the U.S. aggressors.”

    What this implies is that Putin, Medvedev, Lavrov, Dugin and the rest of the Russian leadership are all basically crazy for:

    1) giving out passports
    2) moving on Georgian territory during the Olympics when every American was watching
    3) recognizing the breakaway regions
    4) refusing to withdraw or back down
    5) ignoring that NATO pretty much has unlimited resources and air power including stealth weapons and can defy the United Nations security council pretty much at will.

    If the Russians really are that stupid, they certainly will be attacked and they certainly will deserve it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s