Daily Archives: September 2, 2007

September 2, 2007 — Contents

SUNDAY SEPTEMBER 2 CONTENTS


(1) The Sunday Photos: Novaya Gazeta Special Edition

(2) Russia Humiliates itself in the Washington Post

(3) The Sunday Book Review

(4) The Sunday Funnies

(5) The Sunday Sports Section: Russia’s U.S. Open Bloodbath

NOTE: If you have not read it yet, be sure not to miss our Editorial on the arrests in the Politkovskaya case, which lays out the outrageous nature of the Kremlin’s assault on the dignity of Anna’s memory as it struggles to pin the blame, yet again, on Boris Berezovsky. One has to wonder whether the Kremlin is at all serious about incarcerating him, since if it did it would lose its ever-ready scapegoat for its atrocities. It’s important for the facts to be distributed as widely and emphatically as possible.

The Sunday Photos: Novaya Gazeta Special


We announced earlier in the week that Novaya Gazeta now has an English language edition. To celebrate that most welcome development, we present the photographs of their courageous editors and staff. These are just some of the many committed, courageous Russian patriots who struggle to put out the paper every week against overwhelming odds. Every one of them is a hero. For non-speakers of Russian, the first picture is editor-in-chief Dmitry Muratov and next to him is Sergei Sokolov — this allows you to put the names from our recent editorial about the Politkovskaya arrests with the faces.



МУРАТОВ
Дмитрий
Андреевич

Главный редактор

СОКОЛОВ
Сергей
Михайлович

Шеф-
редактор,
член
редколлегии

КОЖЕУРОВ
Сергей
Николаевич

Генеральный директор, член редколлегии

ЛИПСКИЙ
Андрей
Евгеньевич

Заместитель главного редактора, редактор отдела политики и СМИ, член редколлегии


ЯРОШЕВСКИЙ
Виталий
Семенович

Заместитель главного
редактора,
редактор
отдела
«Общество», куратор
корреспон-
дентской сети,
член
редколлегии

МИКЕЛАДЗЕ
Нугзар
Кобаевич

Заместитель главного редактора, руководитель службы информации, член редколлегии

САРУХАНОВ
Петр
Борисович

Главный художник, член редколлегии

САФРОНОВ
Юрий
Алексеевич

Шеф-редактор, член редколлегии «Новой газеты», «Свободное пространство»


БОССАРТ
Алла
Борисовна

Обозреватель

ЕРОШОК
Зоя
Валентиновна

Обозреватель

МОЗГОВОЙ
Владимир
Иванович

Специальный корреспондент

НИКИТИНСКИЙ
Леонид
Васильевич

Обозреватель

ТОПОЛЯНСКИЙ
Виктор
Давыдович

Обозреватель

ФЕЛЬГЕНГАУЭР
Павел
Евгеньевич

Обозреватель

РЫБИНА
Людмила
Алексеевна

Обозреватель

ГЛИКМАН
Екатерина
Леонидовна

Специальный корреспондент


БУНИМОВИЧ
Евгений
Абрамович


ГЕНИС
Александр
Александрович


ГРИШКОВЕЦ
Евгений

КОЛЯДА
Николай


ЛИПСКИЙ
Андрей
Евгеньевич

Редактор отдела, заместитель главного редактора, член редколлегии

КРИГЕР
Илья
Борисович

Заведующий отделом

РОСТОВА
Наталия
Владимировна

Руководитель направления СМИ

МУЛИН
Сергей
Васильевич

Обозреватель


ПОЛУХИН
Алексей
Викторович

Редактор отдела

ПОЛУХИНА
Юлия
Салимжановна

Корреспондент, зав. отдела «Повседневный рынок»

ОВЯН
Анна
Вагановна

Корреспондент

СВЕДОВАЯ
Наталья
Дмитриевна

Корреспондент


МИКЕЛАДЗЕ
Нугзар
Кобаевич

Заместитель главного редактора, руководитель службы информации, член редколлегии

ШАМБУРОВА
Анна
Васильевна

Заведующая отделом

БОБРОВА
Ольга
Николаевна

Обозреватель

КАНЫГИН
Павел
Юрьевич

Корреспондент


ЯРОШЕВСКИЙ
Виталий
Семенович

Заместитель главного редактора, редактор отдела “Общество”, куратор корреспон-
дентской сети, член редколлегии

ПОЛИКОВСКИЙ
Алексей
Михайлович

Обозреватель

КВАШЕНКИНА
(ИВАНОВА)
Екатерина
Ивановна

Руководитель направления «Шофер»

ЛЕВИНА
Анна
Викторовна

Руководитель направления «Шофер»


ХЛЕБНИКОВ
Олег
Никитьевич

Шеф-редактор отдела, член редколлегии

ДЬЯКОВА
Елена
Александровна

Редактор отдела

РАССАДИН
Станислав
Борисович

Обозреватель

МАЛЮКОВА
Лариса
Леонидовна

Специальный корреспондент


АНДРЕЕВА
Надежда
Анатольевна

Соб. корр. по Саратовской, Волоградской и Астраханской обл.

АСМОЛОВ
Григорий
Александрович

Соб. корр. по Ближнему Востоку

БРОНШТЕЙН
Борис
Семенович

Соб. корр. по республике Татарстан, Удмуртской республике, Республике Марий Эл, Чувашской Республике, и Кировской обл.

БОРОДЯНСКИЙ
Георгий
Эмильевич

Соб. корр. по Омской, Томской и Тюменской обл.


ЗОЛОВКИН
Сергей
Алексеевич

Соб. корр. в Германии

КОПЫЛОВА
Наталья
Валентиновна

Редактор «Новой газеты» в Сибири (Новосибирск)

ЛЕБЕДЕВА
Анна
Сергеевна

Соб. корр. по Южному округу России

МИНЕЕВ
Александр
Иванович

Соб. корр. в Брюсселе


АСРИЯНЦ
Сергей
Николаевич

Редактор сайта “Новой газеты”

ГРОМОВ
Борис
Викторович

web-master

ЧЕЛИЩЕВА
Вера
Вадимовна

Корреспондент

ДАНИЛОВА
Дарья
Юрьевна

Корреспондент


КОЖЕУРОВ
Сергей
Николаевич

Директор, член редколлегии

ШИРЯЕВ
Валерий
Геннадьевич

Заместитель директора

БОЧКАЛОВА
Светлана
Ивановна

Зам. директора по изданию и распространению

ЗЫКОВА
Наталья
Олеговна

Заместитель директора по персоналу

Russia Humiliates Itself in the Washington Post

Slate magazine highlights the hilarious failure of the Kremlin’s recent propaganda venture in in the Washington Post:

The collapse of the Soviet Union was good news for almost everybody—Russia’s citizens, its captured “republics,” nations targeted by Soviet missiles, and neighboring states such as Finland, just to get the list rolling.

The only losers were fans of Soviet propaganda who found entertainment in the classic Soviet posters urging comrades to “Learn the great path of Lenin’s and Stalin’s Party!,” the glorious propaganda films denouncing the rotten bourgeois ideology of the warmongering capitalist jackals, and even the propaganda lite of Soviet Life magazine, which extolled the superiority of communism to American readers.

Soviet propaganda hit the skids during the Gorbachev era, and as the empire broke up, its propaganda essentially vanished. But the heavy-handed purveyors of party-line orthodoxy and nationalist cant have returned with the rise of President Vladimir Putin, and a demonstration of this lost art’s resurgence can be found in a 10-page advertising supplement to today’s (Aug. 30) Washington Post, titled “Russia: Beyond the Headlines.” (It can also be viewed on the newspaper’s Web site.)

Produced by Rossiyskaya Gazeta, the official Russian government newspaper, the section mimics the look and feel of a hometown paper, with news, an op-ed section, a sports feature (Maria Sharapova), two business pages, an entertainment page, and even a recipe for “Salad Oliver.” But beneath the shattered syntax of these laughable pieces beats the bloody red heart of the tone-deaf Soviet propagandist.

No, Papa Putin doesn’t appear in the supplement with two adoring Young Pioneers on his lap. The section never denounces the imperialist running dogs or praises the peace-loving workers of the world. Nor do the writers invoke Marxist-Leninist philosophy to break through the West’s shortsightedness in order to understand present-day objective conditions from a class perspective. There’s no need for such antiquated language when pieces like “The Opposition’s Disarray Is Lucky for Some” exist to carry the new Kremlin’s freight.

A USA Today-style infographic at the bottom of “Opposition’s Disarray” reports the results of a poll titled, “Have You Heard of the Other Russia Movement?” The results:

I haven’t heard of it: 61 percent
Not sure: 15 percent
It is a political opposition movement essential for the proper functioning of society: 13 percent
It is a collection of marginal figures who should be kept out of power: 11 percent.

Talk about loaded questions!

On the opinion page, we learn in “Dog-Walking—a Gateway to Wisdom” that Vladimir Putin likes Labradors and takes Connie, his Lab, with him to televised events. “Russia’s citizens like Putin, and that’s probably why there are a fair number of Labradors on my neighborhood streets,” the writer states. All glory to Labrador-loving Comrade Putin and his patriotic walking-dog, Connie!

Elsewhere on the page, the editors establish editorial guidelines as they solicit questions and views from American readers:

Anonymous letters, personal attacks, letters advocating extremism, letters to other people, mass mailings and commercial appeals are not published.

The new comrades want your phone number, too, but only for verification purposes. I’ll bet that’s what they told the parasite Sakharov.

As journalism—even state-sponsored journalism—”Russia: Behind the Headlines” presents more questions than it answers. A feature about Russian Railways notes that the president of the state-owned firm, Vladimir Yakunin, earned a degree as a mechanical engineer in 1972 before laboring at the USSR’s United Nations office between 1985 and 1991. Did the comrade’s work between 1972 and 1985 get tossed down the memory hole? Shouldn’t readers know—as a quick Web search reveals—that Yakunin may become president of Russia after Putin steps down? Earlier this year in a piece handicapping the potential successors, the International Herald Tribune called Yakunin a former KGB agent.

Back in the 1990s, Regardie’s magazine attempted to parody the foreign-nation advertising supplements that occasionally run in the Post,albeit to little success, because you can’t parody state propaganda. The only way to slog through the stilted, typo-marred copy of “Russia: Behind the Headlines” is to impose a Boris Badenov-style Russian accent on the stories and edit out the articles the and a as you read along. Sentences such as “Russia’s Central Bank has declared the necessity of a symbol for the ruble, one that would eventually be in league with the $ dollar and € euro signs on the world market” suddenly become bearable. Sentences such as “President Putin promised to create the National Russian Language Foundation, which would promote Russian language and culture all over the world” become delightful.

Who is this supplement for? Obviously, the section’s intended customers are American businessmen and Washington diplomats who may have gotten a chuckle or a groan out of it before feeding it into their recycling pile. As bad as Soviet propaganda was, it was always good enough that you could hum along to the strains of its martial music, but the amateurism of this supplement carries no tune. It’s a bad sign for the Putin regime if it thinks this expensive PR exercise will elicit anything but laughter from the West.

Speaking for propaganda lovers everywhere, I hope that once Putin sees “Russia: Behind the Headlines” as the abomination it is, he’ll reopen the gulag and send the supplement’s editors and writers into exile.

*******

Is “Russia: Behind the Headlines” a sign of Putin’s fall? Can the Russian government really be that clueless about the English language? Send propaganda tips for the Russian government to document.write(““)document.write(“slate.pressbox”+”@”+”gmail.com”);slate.pressbox@gmail.comdocument.write(‘‘);, and I’ll forward them to the country’s maximum leader. (E-mail may be quoted by name in “The Fray,” Slate‘s readers’ forum, in a future article, or elsewhere unless the writer stipulates otherwise. Permanent disclosure: Slate is owned by the Washington Post Co.)

The Sunday Book Review

We previously mentioned that Yuri Felshtinsky, author with Alexander Litvinenko of the book Blowing Up Russia, was recently featured on C-SPAN discussing his book.

The video is now available on C-SPAN’s website.

Click here to watch the program.

The Sunday Funnies


Source
: A reader from South Africa.


Source: A reader from South Africa.


Source: Ellustrator.

Translation: The caption says: “We can find out about the Lomonosov spine/ridge through the use of an x-ray machine.” Explanation: It’s a play on words. The extension of the so-called “Lomonosov Ridge” into the Arctic Ocean is the basis for Russia’s recent claim to a large portion of the Arctic sea floor. The Russian word for “ridge” also means “spine”. Lomonosov — pictured in the cartoon — was a 18th century scientist-writer (something like a Russian Benjamin Frankin, a Russian renaissance man).


Annals of Russian Tennis: The U.S. Open Bloodbath

Oh my, the famous beauty of Russian tennis players!
It’s breathtaking to behold!

Last week was a real bloodbath for Russia at the U.S. Open tennis tournament in New York City. It may go down as the most humiliating single week of tennis in Russia’s history. But nobody who reads this blog should have been the least bit surprised.

On the ladies side, the odious and contemptible Nadia Petrova (pictured above), at world rank #7 the second-best “real Russian” female tennis player in the world, was blown off the court in easy straight sets in the third round by an unseeded Hungarian not ranked in the world’s top 30 players. Petrova, a really classic Russian nationalist monster, is infamous on this blog for appearing at tennis tournaments sporting a white visor with a giant Russian flag emblazoned on it — something no other female tennis player we know of ever does (can you imagine the world’s reaction if any American player tried this?). Of all countries which might inflict a humiliating loss like this upon Russia, former Soviet slave states are surely among the most painful for Russia to endure. The same fate befell Russia’s vaunted beauty Maria Kirilenko, ranked #36 in the world, in her third-round match against the world #50 from Ukraine: Again, humiliating straight-set dismissal by a lower-ranked player from one of the countries a Russian could least stand to lose to (the Russian managed to win only six of eighteen games played). And to round things out, #14 seed Elena Dementieva, the serveless wonder, was routed by a lower-ranked Austrian player, winning only three of eighteen games played.

And then it got worse. Oh, so much worse.


Maria Sharapova, “Russia’s best” player (ranked #2 in the world, she lives permanently in the U.S. and learned her game here), was soundly crushed in her third match by Polish newcomer Agnieszka Radwanska, not ranked in the top 30 in the world. It was the earliest ejection of the #2 seed from the U.S. Open in more than a quarter century. It was so embarrassing that Sharapova’s own father Yuri got up from his vulture-like perch in the stands and walked out of the stadium before the match had even ended. Shamapova had previously set the record for the earliest dismissal from the U.S. Open by the reigning Wimbledon champion, and now has established another benchmark in infamy to go along with it. This left only Svetlana Kuznetsova, Russia’s second-best player (and the best “real” Russian), a player who has won only one tournament all year and only won that one because of three, count them, three defaults, and Anna Chakvetadze, whose really a Georgian, to defend Russia’s honor in the fourth round (Dinara Safina, sister of Marat, was also in the mix . . . until she met Henin in the fourth round and got blown away like lint, bageled in the first set and soundly crushed in the second).

Sharapova had been given a ridiculous sham of a draw, almost as if the tournament organizers were willing her into the finals for marketing purposes, with all the top-ranked Russian patsies in her half and none of the dangerous non-Russian players (Ivanovic, Jancovic, Henin and both Williams sisters were all sent to the opposite half, meaning Shamapova would have to face at most one of them and then only in the finals, but once again Russia’s so-called “best” player simply couldn’t measure up to ostensibly inferior opponents. Radwanska, an accomplished and complete all-court player, brutally exposed Shamapova’s pathetically one-dimensional power game, going so far as to taunt Shamapova’s vaunted serve by standing well inside the baseline to receive second serves. Shamapova committed a truly ghastly 49 unforced errors and 12 double faults, and as the camera panned around the stadium the myth of her star power and beauty were blown to smithereens — half the seats were empty.

These losses would have been bitterly humiliating under any circumstances, but for them to come at the hands of a Ukrainian, a Pole and a Hungarian makes them quintessentially bitter. And the icing on this poisonous cake is that the losses occurred in front of American crowds. Ouch! It doesn’t get any worse than that. Ah, the glory of life in Vladimir Putin’s Russia!


On the men’s side, things were just as bleak. Britain got a delicious bit of revenge , when its world #91-ranked favourite son Tim Henman (pictured above) soundly whipped Russia’s fourth-best player, #27-ranked (and seeded) Dimitry Tursunov, ejecting the Russian in his very first match at the year’s final grand slam. Jolly good show old beans! Russia suffered further humliation when Marat Safin, its biggest male star, third-best player and the #25 seed, was destroyed in easy straight sets by an unseeded Polish player in his second match of the tournament; Russia’s #2 player, Mikhail Youzhny, also suffered a humiliating thrashing at the hands of an unseeded German in his second match, leaving the ranks of Russia’s male contingent at the prestigious American tournament totally devastated before the third round could even begin. The next Russian below Tursunov, #39 Igor Andreev, was dismissed in his second match by a player ranked more than 20 places beneath him. We’ve often pointed out how ridiculously overrated Russian female tennis players are, but it’s worth remembering in their defense that Russia’s men are far more pathetic. The only significant Russian man who remained in the draw after all this carnages was Nikolay Davydenko, Russia’s highest-ranked player, and he was born in Ukraine. Moreover, his continued presence only served to remind fans of the match-fixing controversy that is swirling around him.