The Glorious Russian Flag!
Welcome to La RussophobeYou may e-mail La Russophobe with comments or submissions for publication consideration at firstname.lastname@example.org. Congratulations, you are now reading the best Russia politics bloggers in the world! Our press: "Essential." -- Blogwatch "Ferocious." -- Peter Finn, Washington Post "Notorious." -- The Moscow Times Our creed: You don't really know Russia unless you read La Russophobe! Our motto: Russia is the best country in the world . . . except for all the others. Our slogan: "Что-то типа Новой Газеты на английском языке." (Translation: Something like Novaya Gazeta, but in English). NOTICE: This blog quotes from source material, and links to it. When a post contains quotes and original material, the quotes are in ordinary print and the original in boldface. See "About LR" in the title bar for copyright notice.
Supporting La RussophobeLa Russophobe does not solicit or accept financial support from any source. If you would like to show your support for LR and your opposition to the rise of dictatorship in Russia, the easiest way is to create a Digg or StumbleUpon or Delicious account and use it to favorite some of our posts. LR also welcomes your e-mail comments and submissions for publication, and we urge you to support the effort to boycott of the Sochi Olympics.
Feed La Russophobe!Click here to feed La Russophobe
Russia’s Invasion of Georgia: The Truth
Remembering Natalia EstemirovaClick here to honor the memory of Natalia's daughter Lana by making a contribution to her education fund, established by the Memorial human rights organization.
Search our Archives
Archives by Month
Blog Stats (add 300,000 from Blogger)
- 3,732,301 visits
- La Russophobe’s New Blog is now Live
- La Russophobe is now on Facebook and Twitter
- September 30, 2011 — Contents
- EDITORIAL: We Told you So
- EDITORIAL: Estonia Whips Russian Butt
- EDITORIAL: The Russian Economy is Collapsing
- Viking Russia, Land of Barbarians
- Andrei Zubov, Russophobe
- Kara-Murza on Putin’s Return
- CARTOON: Yelkin on Putin’s Return
- SPECIAL EXTRA EDITORIAL: Putin, President for Life
- September 23, 2011 — Contents
- EDITORIAL: Prokhorov in the Woodshed
- EDITORIAL: Drunken Russian Killers
- EDITORIAL: Does Britain still Remember Chamberlain?
PatrickwaBly on EDITORIAL: LR in Russian… Tony Maxwell Hatt on Peter LaVelle: Scum-sucking tr… PatrZossy on Why is LR a Russophobe? Why ar… 5 Reasons Marxism Ha… on Lenin was Evil 47. 📢Must Read 👉LETT… on LETTER: Russians Outraged by S…
Tag CloudAnastasia Pavlyuchenkova barack obama boris nemtsov Boris Yeltsin bric chechnya china cold war cold war II dave essel dmitry medvedev economics editorial ellustrator essel estemirova freedom house Garry Kasparov gazprom georgia history hypocrisy ikea ingushetia internet iran journalism kasparov KGB khodorkovsky kozlovsky Kremlin latynina maria sharapova medvedev Mikhail Gorbachev Mikhail Khodorkovsky Moscow Nadia Petrova nemtsov novaya gazeta obama oleg kozlovsky ossetia paul goble Politkovskaya putin racism ramzan kadyrov russia russian army russian economy russian stock market russophiles saakashvili Sergei Magnitsky sharapova siberia sochi Soviet Union sports stalin stanislav markelov Svetlana Kuznetsova tennis ukraine united russia United States Vera Zvonareva vladimir frolov vladimir milov vladimir putin vladimir ryzhkov yulia latynina Yury Luzhkov
Category Cloudchechnya cold war II contents corruption economics editorial elections georgia halls of power history hypocrisy iron curtain journalism litvinenko militarism murders neo-soviet crackdown neo-soviet failure opposition groups rating russia rhetoric russia russian people russophiles social services sports sunday photos translations Uncategorized weaponizing energy
- Scumbag former senators look to profit from Russian evil. publicintegrity.org/2014/09/02/154… 5 years ago
- The Russian Mothers Waiting for News of Their Missing Soldier Sons newsweek.com/russian-mother… 5 years ago
- @Dr_Ariel_Cohen Important point! Obama, obsessed with nuclear disarmament, is radically impeding it! 5 years ago
- @DanielabKennedy Not where Russia is concerned. 5 years ago
- RT @ARothNYT: Two leaked convos btw Pskov paratroopers which claim 80 soldiers from their company were killed in Ukraine. 1/2 http://t.co/… 5 years ago
LR’s Google Page Rank
Daily Archives: July 27, 2007
FRIDAY JULY 27 CONTENTS
How is reasonable, reliable, civilized Russia trying to resolve its dispute with Britain after expelling four British diplomats in a pure act of spite? Well, according to the Moscow Times, first it is kicking out totally innocent business men, inviting Britain to do the same (followed by the US and EU):
Moscow has asked the British Embassy’s top trade and development official to leave the country in a move suggesting the ongoing diplomatic dispute between Britain and Russia could spill over into the economic sphere. Reports that the senior embassy official is responsible for liaising with Russian government officials and British investors indicate that Andrew Levi counsellor for economic and scientific affairs, is one of the four British Embassy officials who have been told to leave. Multiple sources close to Levi, who oversees trade and investment, have confirmed that he is one of the four and is due to leave the country Sunday. The sources close to Levi spoke on condition of anonymity, and a British Embassy spokesman said Wednesday that it was standard practice not to identify staff involved in tit-for-tat expulsions. Levi himself could not be contacted Wednesday. Analysts were surprised the list of officials being expelled included such a high-ranking official, although they were divided on what effect this would have on the climate for British investment in Russia. Sources familiar with Levi’s case said Wednesday that he had played a significant role in dealing with recent difficulties faced by British firms operating in Russia. They said he acted as the point man during the negotiations over the Sakhalin-2 crisis, where Shell was forced to sell a controlling stake in a $22 billion energy project in the Far East to state-controlled Gazprom.
Next, Russia is announcing that it plans to dramatically increase espionage, inviting Britain, the EU and the US to do the same. In other words, Cold War II. The Associated Press reports:
President Vladimir Putin vowed Wednesday to strengthen Russia’s military capability and intensify spying abroad in response to U.S. plans to build missile defense sites and deploy troops in Eastern Europe. “The situation in the world and internal political interests require the Foreign Intelligence Service to increase its capabilities permanently, primarily in the field of information and analytical support for the country’s leadership,” Putin said at a meeting with senior military and security officers in the Kremlin, Interfax reported. The Foreign Intelligence Service is a successor to the KGB. Putin did not identify specific targets, but officials in the United States and Britain have said recently that Moscow has intensified its spying in those countries. Putin said U.S. plans to station troops in Eastern Europe and Washington’s intention to base missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic pose security challenges for Russia. Washington says the facilities are needed to protect the United States and Europe from missiles from Iran or other rogue states. Putin has proposed that the United States use a radar base in Azerbaijan for missile defense. U.S. officials have questioned whether the facility is technically compatible with U.S. systems.
Writing in the Moscow Times, Georgy Bovt illustrates the breadth and depth of neo-Soviet dementia:
I recently bumped into a business acquaintance. It would be wrong to call him simply an entrepreneur, since he works for the state. But he isn’t a bureaucrat either, since he “privatized” his position long ago, turning it into a thriving business. In addition, various “auxiliary” and “middleman” businesses have sprung up around his position. As a result, he has grown increasingly prosperous and joined the ranks of the middle class — the dream of so many at the dawn of Russia’s democracy.
We often heard that a middle class would appear in Russia, that it would put our lives on the right path, that a democratic civil society would develop, that it would force our leaders to answer to the people for their actions, and that we would finally begin conversing with “civilized” nations using the same civilized and democratic language.
Many people still like to discuss politics in their leisure time. It is interesting to observe how some highly educated and informed people occasionally come up with somewhat bizarre views reflecting a mixture of state propaganda and their own distorted perceptions of the world.
The bureaucrat-cum-businessman mentioned earlier unexpectedly began to explain in detail the “U.S. plot against Russia.” Russians everywhere discuss this theme nowadays. Until now, all the talk I’d heard regarding the “U.S. plot” was based on the same old examples: a desire to influence events in Georgia, Ukraine, the CIS and the Baltic states; plans to install anti-ballistic missile batteries in Europe; the ambition to weaken Russia’s economy, and so on.
But my interlocutor revealed a very original variation on the theme of U.S. subversion. “Do you know the reason behind Russians’ harmful, widespread passion for beer consumption?” he asked me.
“What is it?” I casually responded, expecting to hear the usual lecture on excessive public drinking, which I also find disgusting.
I was wrong. My acquaintance informed me that it was all part of the U.S. plot against Russia. Beer, he explained, contains a high quantity of female hormones. Russian men who get drunk on beer gradually become impotent. That is how the Americans are trying to destroy the Russians.
Rubbish, you say? Well, of course it is. But now I ask you: Aren’t the points of contention that have developed in recent months between Russia and the West also nothing but nonsense? The whole problem seems to consist of nothing more than petty arguments over limited and basically trivial questions. The issues on the table include: Polish meat; Polish and Czech installations for U.S. anti-missile batteries; Eastern Europe’s various historical grievances; Moscow’s policy of “energy blackmail” in response to accusations of authoritarianism by the West. What’s more, even global terrorism has become a nonissue.
Are there no other questions that deserve the attention of experts at the highest level? Are no other prospects envisioned for Russia’s development than feverishly resolving various micro-crises, one after another?
Matters have really gotten out of hand. Last week, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov created a minor diplomatic scandal by publicly stating his displeasure with the way Foreign Affairs, a venerable U.S. journal, had edited an article he wrote. But the journal’s editor subjected Lavrov’s piece to the same journalistic standards applied to other authors, and was “foolish” enough not to make an exception this one time. Did this require a demarche from the foreign minister of a major country?
The wrangling between London and Moscow over the Litvinenko case has come to resemble the theater of the absurd. To the Kremlin’s credit, however, at least they have stopped organizing news conferences for Andrei Lugovoi.
Moreover, Russia and the West have dug in their heels over Kosovo, as if they are deliberately emphasizing their mutual unwillingness to compromise. The Kosovo issue — and many more like it — has shown that there is no desire to listen to each other, and the tone of discussion has become increasingly ugly.
Relations between the East and West have grown dramatically more shallow, turning into some kind of propagandistic squabble. This has happened before in human history, when it seemed that international relations had become caught up with utter nonsense acquiring a definite superficiality. That condition remained in force until something major or terrible occurred, which brought everybody back to their senses restored the correct hierarchy of civilized values.
Writing in the Moscow Times, Alexander Golts exposes isolated Russia, once again on a crazed path of self-destruction:
I recently saw on the streets of Moscow a billboard with the following text: “Army and Navy — Russia’s allies.” The author of this propagandistic text probably thought he or she was quoting Tsar Alexander III, who purportedly said something of the kind. In fact, the sovereign actually declared that Russia had no allies except the King of Chernogoriya. The version referring to the army and navy was created by a “patriot” in the early 1990s. The quote was intended to relay the idea that in a world hostile to Russia, it can only rely on its military strength to survive.
Now we have billboards in Moscow that fully reflect the Kremlin’s world view. Putin has pulled Russia out of the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, or CFE Treaty, alluding to “exceptional circumstances affecting Russia’s security.”
Recall that the main idea of this treaty is to limit the likelihood of military aggression by setting limits on the signatories’ armaments. The first version of the treaty established limits for the NATO and Warsaw Pact blocs. Both the Warsaw Pact and the U.S.S.R. collapsed months after the document was signed in 1990, however. It was then necessary to adapt the CFE Treaty to the new reality. The revised version of the treaty was adopted in 1999 and included limits on armaments for each country separately, and not for the two East-West blocs. The NATO countries, however, never ratified it, demanding that Russia fulfill its agreement to withdraw its forces from Transdnester and Georgia.
In reality, even though Russia continues to demand that NATO fulfills the CFE Treaty, NATO countries maintain fewer armaments than are permitted by the modified version of the treaty.
Moscow considers Washington’s plans to position troops at military bases in Bulgaria and Romania a violation of the CFE Treaty. But the Kremlin prefers to remain silent on the fact that the troops in question will number just 2,000 to 3,000. Moreover, the 1st Armored and 1st Infantry Divisions in Germany were once the United States’ primary military force in Europe. If Washington had plans to achieve a decisive military superiority over Russia, it would not have recalled those troops from Europe.
Moscow’s main complaint is that NATO, following two waves of expansion, now exceeds the military might of Russia by three times. But this objection is groundless. In fact, the NATO “newcomers” want to rid themselves as quickly as possible of the weaponry that Moscow believes gives them potential military superiority. The hundreds of Soviet-era T-55 tanks that Romania, Bulgaria, Hungry and other former Warsaw Pact countries inherited do not strengthen NATO, but weaken it. As long as that scrap metal is part of each country’s arsenal, those nations’ armies cannot meet NATO standards or achieve battle readiness.
The head of the Defense Ministry’s international treaty department, Lieutenant General Yevgeny Buzhinsky, declared last week that there was no chance of “adapting a previously-adapted” treaty. Moscow is demanding that NATO sharply reduce its military potential as a form of “compensation.”
Moscow has rejected the concept of the adapted version of the CFE Treaty. In essence, Moscow is returning to the original concept of the treaty between NATO and the Warsaw Pact with one exception: Russia apparently wants to play the role of the Warsaw Pact itself and stand alone against the rest of Europe.
Despite any real military threat, the Kremlin presents its dissatisfaction with the West by claiming that the West is intent on achieving military superiority over Russia. For Putin, the scandal with Britain is another example of the West’s aggression. London demonstrated that it was not willing come to terms with Moscow’s refusal to extradite Andrei Lugovoi. And they are also unwilling to overlook a radioactive poisoning case in their capital in the interests of maintaining good relations with Moscow.
In the eyes of the Kremlin, Britain is preparing some sort of aggression directed at Russia. Therefore, this is a good time to withdraw from the CFE Treaty.