April 12, 2007 — Contents

THURSDAY APRIL 12 CONTENTS


(1) Editorial: Putting our Money where our Mouth is

(2) Hey, hey, ho, ho — U.S. says “whoa!” to Russia’s WTO

(3) Now, the Kremlin moves on the Blogosphere

(4) Cuban Missle Crisis Redux

(5) Annals of Russophile Gibberish

NOTE OF INTEREST: Many months ago, LR said a new cold war with Russia was coming. Some scoffed. If you search “Russia cold war” on Google News today, you get 1,675 hits. Nuff said? You don’t really understand Russia unless you read La Russophobe.

9 responses to “April 12, 2007 — Contents

  1. The New Cold War is such a hot topic right now that someone should really write a book about it!

    (And thanks for your comment at TV Ontario. I’ve replied there…)

  2. The New Cold War is such a hot topic right now that someone should really write a book about it!

    (And thanks for your comment at TV Ontario. I’ve replied there…)

  3. The New Cold War is such a hot topic right now that someone should really write a book about it!

    (And thanks for your comment at TV Ontario. I’ve replied there…)

  4. That is a fun game. How many results does “America Cold War” get? There are less results for “Russia undemocratic” than “America undemocratic”. In short, google tells us very little about anything.

  5. That is a fun game. How many results does “America Cold War” get? There are less results for “Russia undemocratic” than “America undemocratic”. In short, google tells us very little about anything.

  6. That is a fun game. How many results does “America Cold War” get? There are less results for “Russia undemocratic” than “America undemocratic”. In short, google tells us very little about anything.

  7. PAT: You’re mistaken and have not read the post carefully enough. If you read the results of the search you see many, many articles about events that lead analysts to believe a new cold war is now happening between the US and Russia. That’s the point. The post says nothing about allocating blame for the existence of a cold war, that’s not the point.

  8. PAT: You’re mistaken and have not read the post carefully enough. If you read the results of the search you see many, many articles about events that lead analysts to believe a new cold war is now happening between the US and Russia. That’s the point. The post says nothing about allocating blame for the existence of a cold war, that’s not the point.

  9. PAT: You’re mistaken and have not read the post carefully enough. If you read the results of the search you see many, many articles about events that lead analysts to believe a new cold war is now happening between the US and Russia. That’s the point. The post says nothing about allocating blame for the existence of a cold war, that’s not the point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s