Daily Archives: October 26, 2006

Barbaric Russia Sends Bakhmina to Mordovia

In an act of crude barbarity that surprises even La Russophobe, the Kremlin has sent YUKOS executive Svetlana Bakhmina to prison in the remote region of Mordovia (300 miles from Moscow) for six years, where she will be far removed from her two small children and rarely if ever able to see them. This is torture, pure and simple, of the most uncivilized and cowardly variety. RIA Novosti reports:

A former Yukos executive convicted on embezzlement and tax evasion charges has been sent to serve her six-and-a-half-year sentence in a women’s penal colony in the Central Russian republic of Mordovia, a lawyer for the convicted executive said Wednesday.

On October 2, the Simonovsky Court in Moscow rejected a request from Svetlana Bakhmina’s defense lawyers, who asked that the former deputy head of the legal department at the embattled oil company’s Yukos Moskva unit be allowed to serve her six-and-a-half-year prison term after her younger child, now aged five, turns 14.

One of Bakhmina’s lawyers, Olga Kozyreva, said the decision to send her defendant to the penal colony was illegal, because the court’s decision had not yet come into force.

Bakhmina, the mother of two small children, was charged with failing to pay 606,000 rubles ($22,600) in taxes in 2001-2002 and of diverting 8 billion rubles’ worth ($298.73 million) of property from Yukos subsidiary Tomskneft in the late 1990s. She has maintained her innocence throughout the litigation process.

“I am innocent, but a question of even greater importance to me is when I will be able to see my children again,” Bakhmina said in early October. “I think the time I have spent in detention has already covered what can be qualified as guilt.”

Another lawyer for Bakhmina, Alexander Gofshtein, said they appealed the decision of the Simonovsky Court to the Moscow City Court, which scheduled hearings on the request for November 8.

Legal proceedings, launched against Yukos in 2003, are seen by many as having been politically motivated. So far, they have resulted in the conviction of Bakhmina and other executives and shareholders of Russia’s once largest oil producer, including its ex-CEO, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who is serving an eight-year prison term in a Siberian penal colony.

Kremlin Tries to Blame Politkovskaya Killing on Russia’s "Foreign Enemies"

An interview from the BBC contains the following:

It might be interesting to hear the thoughts of the Lithuanian Government on this. In the spring they announced plans to sell the only crude oil refinery in the Baltic (Mazeikiu Nafta) to a Polish company, against the wishes of the Russian government who wanted a Russian firm to take it over. At the end of the summer oil supplies were halted because of damage to the oil pipeline. The Lithuanian government described this as a “political accident”. In the last few days a huge fire caused about 45m euros’ (£30m) worth of damage to the plant. The Lithuanian Prime Minister says the fire was probably caused by a “technical fault” rather than “external factors”. But in Brussels eyebrows have been raised. In such a climate, will European leaders dare raise freedom of the press and human rights? They always say they do. The Russian ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, smiles genially when I put this to him. “Do they?” he grins. He argues that Europe is conditioned to be scared by Russia. Not long ago the fear was of a strong Soviet Russia threatening invasion. It never happened. Then it was a weak Russia flooding Europe with starving refugees. It never happened. To him, energy is the latest trendy worry and it too will come to naught. I ask him about the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and the perception of many in the West that the Russian government was behind her killing. He says: “Of course the killing produced a negative image in the world but that’s no reason to believe anyone in the government was behind it: it’s like shooting yourself in the foot. Two weeks before that killing took place there was a piece on the internet about preparing for a coup d’etat in Russia and step one was killing that journalist. One should look in another direction than the Kremlin beyond Russia’s borders there are people who want to force a change in Russia and some of them are living in your country.”

“Some of them are living in your country,” huh? Apparently, he’s referring to Boris Berezovsky. OK. That’s one theory. But isn’t it just as credible that the Kremlin would kill Politkovskaya and blame it on Berezovsky, who it has been unable to reach by legal means so far? Maybe if the British government believed Berezovsky killed Politkovskaya, they’d be willing to extradite him?

How neo-Soviet can you get?


Kremlin Tries to Blame Politkovskaya Killing on Russia’s "Foreign Enemies"

An interview from the BBC contains the following:

It might be interesting to hear the thoughts of the Lithuanian Government on this. In the spring they announced plans to sell the only crude oil refinery in the Baltic (Mazeikiu Nafta) to a Polish company, against the wishes of the Russian government who wanted a Russian firm to take it over. At the end of the summer oil supplies were halted because of damage to the oil pipeline. The Lithuanian government described this as a “political accident”. In the last few days a huge fire caused about 45m euros’ (£30m) worth of damage to the plant. The Lithuanian Prime Minister says the fire was probably caused by a “technical fault” rather than “external factors”. But in Brussels eyebrows have been raised. In such a climate, will European leaders dare raise freedom of the press and human rights? They always say they do. The Russian ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, smiles genially when I put this to him. “Do they?” he grins. He argues that Europe is conditioned to be scared by Russia. Not long ago the fear was of a strong Soviet Russia threatening invasion. It never happened. Then it was a weak Russia flooding Europe with starving refugees. It never happened. To him, energy is the latest trendy worry and it too will come to naught. I ask him about the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and the perception of many in the West that the Russian government was behind her killing. He says: “Of course the killing produced a negative image in the world but that’s no reason to believe anyone in the government was behind it: it’s like shooting yourself in the foot. Two weeks before that killing took place there was a piece on the internet about preparing for a coup d’etat in Russia and step one was killing that journalist. One should look in another direction than the Kremlin beyond Russia’s borders there are people who want to force a change in Russia and some of them are living in your country.”

“Some of them are living in your country,” huh? Apparently, he’s referring to Boris Berezovsky. OK. That’s one theory. But isn’t it just as credible that the Kremlin would kill Politkovskaya and blame it on Berezovsky, who it has been unable to reach by legal means so far? Maybe if the British government believed Berezovsky killed Politkovskaya, they’d be willing to extradite him?

How neo-Soviet can you get?


Kremlin Tries to Blame Politkovskaya Killing on Russia’s "Foreign Enemies"

An interview from the BBC contains the following:

It might be interesting to hear the thoughts of the Lithuanian Government on this. In the spring they announced plans to sell the only crude oil refinery in the Baltic (Mazeikiu Nafta) to a Polish company, against the wishes of the Russian government who wanted a Russian firm to take it over. At the end of the summer oil supplies were halted because of damage to the oil pipeline. The Lithuanian government described this as a “political accident”. In the last few days a huge fire caused about 45m euros’ (£30m) worth of damage to the plant. The Lithuanian Prime Minister says the fire was probably caused by a “technical fault” rather than “external factors”. But in Brussels eyebrows have been raised. In such a climate, will European leaders dare raise freedom of the press and human rights? They always say they do. The Russian ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, smiles genially when I put this to him. “Do they?” he grins. He argues that Europe is conditioned to be scared by Russia. Not long ago the fear was of a strong Soviet Russia threatening invasion. It never happened. Then it was a weak Russia flooding Europe with starving refugees. It never happened. To him, energy is the latest trendy worry and it too will come to naught. I ask him about the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and the perception of many in the West that the Russian government was behind her killing. He says: “Of course the killing produced a negative image in the world but that’s no reason to believe anyone in the government was behind it: it’s like shooting yourself in the foot. Two weeks before that killing took place there was a piece on the internet about preparing for a coup d’etat in Russia and step one was killing that journalist. One should look in another direction than the Kremlin beyond Russia’s borders there are people who want to force a change in Russia and some of them are living in your country.”

“Some of them are living in your country,” huh? Apparently, he’s referring to Boris Berezovsky. OK. That’s one theory. But isn’t it just as credible that the Kremlin would kill Politkovskaya and blame it on Berezovsky, who it has been unable to reach by legal means so far? Maybe if the British government believed Berezovsky killed Politkovskaya, they’d be willing to extradite him?

How neo-Soviet can you get?


Kremlin Tries to Blame Politkovskaya Killing on Russia’s "Foreign Enemies"

An interview from the BBC contains the following:

It might be interesting to hear the thoughts of the Lithuanian Government on this. In the spring they announced plans to sell the only crude oil refinery in the Baltic (Mazeikiu Nafta) to a Polish company, against the wishes of the Russian government who wanted a Russian firm to take it over. At the end of the summer oil supplies were halted because of damage to the oil pipeline. The Lithuanian government described this as a “political accident”. In the last few days a huge fire caused about 45m euros’ (£30m) worth of damage to the plant. The Lithuanian Prime Minister says the fire was probably caused by a “technical fault” rather than “external factors”. But in Brussels eyebrows have been raised. In such a climate, will European leaders dare raise freedom of the press and human rights? They always say they do. The Russian ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, smiles genially when I put this to him. “Do they?” he grins. He argues that Europe is conditioned to be scared by Russia. Not long ago the fear was of a strong Soviet Russia threatening invasion. It never happened. Then it was a weak Russia flooding Europe with starving refugees. It never happened. To him, energy is the latest trendy worry and it too will come to naught. I ask him about the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and the perception of many in the West that the Russian government was behind her killing. He says: “Of course the killing produced a negative image in the world but that’s no reason to believe anyone in the government was behind it: it’s like shooting yourself in the foot. Two weeks before that killing took place there was a piece on the internet about preparing for a coup d’etat in Russia and step one was killing that journalist. One should look in another direction than the Kremlin beyond Russia’s borders there are people who want to force a change in Russia and some of them are living in your country.”

“Some of them are living in your country,” huh? Apparently, he’s referring to Boris Berezovsky. OK. That’s one theory. But isn’t it just as credible that the Kremlin would kill Politkovskaya and blame it on Berezovsky, who it has been unable to reach by legal means so far? Maybe if the British government believed Berezovsky killed Politkovskaya, they’d be willing to extradite him?

How neo-Soviet can you get?


Kremlin Tries to Blame Politkovskaya Killing on Russia’s "Foreign Enemies"

An interview from the BBC contains the following:

It might be interesting to hear the thoughts of the Lithuanian Government on this. In the spring they announced plans to sell the only crude oil refinery in the Baltic (Mazeikiu Nafta) to a Polish company, against the wishes of the Russian government who wanted a Russian firm to take it over. At the end of the summer oil supplies were halted because of damage to the oil pipeline. The Lithuanian government described this as a “political accident”. In the last few days a huge fire caused about 45m euros’ (£30m) worth of damage to the plant. The Lithuanian Prime Minister says the fire was probably caused by a “technical fault” rather than “external factors”. But in Brussels eyebrows have been raised. In such a climate, will European leaders dare raise freedom of the press and human rights? They always say they do. The Russian ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, smiles genially when I put this to him. “Do they?” he grins. He argues that Europe is conditioned to be scared by Russia. Not long ago the fear was of a strong Soviet Russia threatening invasion. It never happened. Then it was a weak Russia flooding Europe with starving refugees. It never happened. To him, energy is the latest trendy worry and it too will come to naught. I ask him about the murder of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and the perception of many in the West that the Russian government was behind her killing. He says: “Of course the killing produced a negative image in the world but that’s no reason to believe anyone in the government was behind it: it’s like shooting yourself in the foot. Two weeks before that killing took place there was a piece on the internet about preparing for a coup d’etat in Russia and step one was killing that journalist. One should look in another direction than the Kremlin beyond Russia’s borders there are people who want to force a change in Russia and some of them are living in your country.”

“Some of them are living in your country,” huh? Apparently, he’s referring to Boris Berezovsky. OK. That’s one theory. But isn’t it just as credible that the Kremlin would kill Politkovskaya and blame it on Berezovsky, who it has been unable to reach by legal means so far? Maybe if the British government believed Berezovsky killed Politkovskaya, they’d be willing to extradite him?

How neo-Soviet can you get?


Russian Language on the Verge of Oblivion

In yet another example of Neo-Soviet failure, the Moscow Times documents the recession of the Russian language around the world and particularly in the former Soviet slave states. Russians have got so used to ruling over other countries as bullies and crude thugs that they are simply unequipped to deal with them as equals. We see the blunt manifestation of this fact in Russia’s current imbroglio with Georgia, and it is present in Kyrgyzstan as well:

BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan — Zulya Kalimbetova, a 22-year-old waitress at an outdoor cafe, boasts that she is the only one of 10 siblings in her family who speaks Russian. “I learned it here by myself, in town, because I am smart,” Kalimbetova said, speaking slowly with a heavy accent, confusing her verb endings and pronouns. But she concedes she’s at a disadvantage compared to earlier generations. “My mother speaks Russian better because she studied in school,” she said.

Kalimbetova never had a chance to study Russian in school because, coming from Osh, the country’s most depressed region, she never went to school. She is not alone. Like Kalimbetova, millions of young men and women in the former Soviet Union and its former satellite states are either unable or opting not to study the language of Pushkin, Tolstoy and Lenin. While the numbers have been slipping since the Soviet collapse, the decline of Russian speakers is now beginning to be felt more acutely around the world.

Indeed, by 2025, according to a recent study by the Center for Demography and Human Ecology at the Russian Academy of Sciences, the number of people speaking Russian will be roughly equal to that at the beginning of the last century. For now, Russian is the fourth-most-spoken language on earth, behind English, Chinese and Spanish, according to the center’s figures. In Russia, 130 million people speak the language, not counting newborns. Another 26.4 million citizens of former Soviet republics are native Russian speakers, and there are an additional 7.5 million Russian speakers sprinkled around the globe. About 114 million people speak Russian as a foreign language.

But the center projects that in a decade, Russian will be eclipsed by French, Hindu and Arab and, within the next 15 years, it will be pushed to 10th place by Portuguese and Bengali. One obvious reason for the decline is that Russia itself is shrinking, as the population sheds 700,000 people every year.

Another factor is that, beyond Russia’s borders, the prestige associated with the language has been ebbing since the country lost its status as a global communist empire. “As the geopolitical importance of Russia degenerated to being little more than a big supplier of raw materials for other countries’ growing high-tech economies, so did the demand for knowing Russian,” said Kirill Razlogov, an analyst at the Institute for Cultural Research.

In many former Soviet republics, particularly in Central Asia, Russian was once the language of the elite. “Now, with advancing globalization,” Razlogov said, “more people opt for English rather than Russian, deciding they’d rather read Shakespeare in his native tongue rather than the Russian translation.”

Turkmen leader Saparmurat Niyazov has made the anti-Russian movement state policy, banning in 1995 the teaching of Russian at almost all universities and schools as well as books, street signs, posters and advertisements that are printed in Russian. Elsewhere in the former communist world, the anti-Russian trend is not quite so draconian, but widespread. From the Romanian capital of Bucharest to Budapest to Warsaw to Prague, English, not Russian, is the language of commerce and, in many cases, mass communication.

The Center for Demography and Human Ecology estimates that the number of students studying Russian in Eastern and Central Europe plunged to 935,000 in 2004 from 10 million in 1990. In the Baltics, where opposition to the communist regime was strongest and the first Soviet republics declared independence, there has been an unmistakable move away from Russian. In Estonia, a 1995 law relegated Russian to the status of a foreign language. And in Latvia, a 1999 law mandated that officials communicate with citizens only in Latvian, even in those areas with a majority of Russian speakers. “We want to make Latvians out of Russians,” Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga was reported as saying in 2004.

While there are no restrictions on learning or speaking Russian in Lithuania, the language suffers from a serious image problem, as is the case elsewhere. “Young people here don’t associate their career aspirations with Russia,” said Aurelijus Gutauskas, a professor at the Law Institute of Lithuania. “They all look to the West and choose instead to learn English, French and German.”

Likewise, Western students have lost interest in studying Russian. While a generation of young Americans were urged to study all things Russian in the wake of the 1957 Sputnik launch, in 2004 a paltry 27,000 chose to learn it, according to the center’s figures. With Latin America to the south and the war on terrorism raging in the Middle East, central Asia and elsewhere, Spanish and Arabic are widely considered more useful.

Back in Bishkek, they seem to feel the same way. Within the walls of the private American University in Central Asia, ethnic Kyrgyz students from middle-class families are more likely to converse in English than Russian. But for those who hail from the country’s rural precincts, where abject poverty, backwardness and a feudal Oriental civilization predominates, Russian may remain for some time a symbol of progress and culture. Shirin Narynbayeva, an American University student with a round face, explained: “I chose to learn Russian so that no one would ever think that I came from a village.”

How will Russians react to this news? With predictable hostility and contempt for those who choose not to get involved with Russian. They will never ask themselves what they might have done to cause the world to reject Russian language, much less what they might do to reform and improve. Haughtily and imperiously, they will march into oblivion.

What Estonians Think of Russians

Here are some penetrating comments from an interesting blog about Estonia:

  • Because the Soviets killed more Estonians than the Nazis did, the Estonian people have the right to make their own moral judgements about the actors of World War II.
  • This week, Russian President Vladimir Putin will sit down with European Union members in Russia’s former Grand Duchy of Finland to talk about things like dead journalists, natural gas, and Georgia. Putin is feeling tough after deporting all of those people with Georgian names back to Georgia, and now he’s up for a dessert – some appetizing disunity, plus the obligatory Estonia bashing, in Finland – the fourteenth republic.
  • It looks like tiny Estonia won’t be the only country feeling the Kremlin’s heat from here on out. Unable to divide and conquer [ie: cite the oppression of Russian speakers in Estonia and Latvia] the Russian answer to a semi-united front from the European Union appears to be to spread the criticism, to the farthest reaches of the continent. Mr Putin pointed to the southern resort town of Marbella, where the mayoress and former mayor have been jailed and thousands of illegal homes face demolition, as well as other Spanish corruption cases.El País said the Spanish prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, had been “perplexed” by the comments. Italy’s Romano Prodi had been left “without words” when Mr Putin pointed out that his country had invented the mafia concept, the newspaper said.
  • President Valdimir Putin, addressing the World Congress of Compatriots in St. Petersburg, said: “I cannot fail to mention the well-known fact of mass denial of citizenship rights in Latvia and Estonia. There are about 600,000 so-called non-citizens there, who are permanent residents.” According to the Estonian Foreign Ministry, the number of stateless persons in Estonia is down to 8.8 percent of the total population, or 120,511. So far a little more than 4,000 people have received citizenship this year. Over the past five years about 5,900 people have been naturalized per year.

Let’s see now . . . first they make the Georigans hate them . . . then the Estonians . . . next the Spanish . . . then the Italians . . . then all the women of the world . . . hmmmm . . . does La Russophobe sense a pattern is developing?

Looks Like a Job for SUPER Russia, Savior of the Planet!

Here’s a hot one: Russia can’t stop its population from dwindling to zero, and it can’t clean up its host of horrific toxic cities, and it’s never even landed a man on the moon, but it’s pretty darn sure it can shoot down any asteroids, comets or meteors that may threaten the planet. The Times of London reports:

Russia is prepared to repel asteroids to save Earth, Viktor Remishevsky, the deputy head of the Russian space agency, has said. “Russia’s rocket-manufacturing complex can create the means in space to repulse asteroids threatening Earth,” Mr Remishevsky said. But he emphasised that saving Earth demanded international co-operation. “Above all, space research institutions, and the infrastructure of the Russian Academy of Sciences, should warn about the threat of asteroids falling to Earth,” he said. According to the Institute of Applied Astronomy in Russia, about 400 asteroids and more than 30 comets present a potential threat to the planet. The Institute is particularly concerned about an asteroid known as Number 2907, a kilometer-wide chunk of space rock which, it believes — “with a large degree of certainty” — will strike the Earth on December 16, 2880.

Last La Russophobe heard, Russians were planning on setting up housekeeping on Mars. Perhaps they’ve changed priorities now. She believes there was also a “large degree of certainty” that Russia would become democratic after the fall of the USSR, wasn’t there? Or at least that it wouldn’t elect a proud KGB spy president . . . ah well. Certainty isn’t what it used to be, especially not in Russia.