Daily Archives: February 4, 2008

February 4, 2008 — Contents

MONDAY FEBRUARY 4 CONTENTS

(1) Another Original LR Translation: Humped and Dumped

(2) EDITORIAL: The Beetroot Republic

(3) Annals of Neo-Soviet Hypocrisy I: A New Low

(4) Annals of Neo-Soviet Hypocrisy II: The Lawless Kremlin

(5) Ukraine, Georgia to Form Anti-Russian Gas Axis

(6) The Crackdown on Journalism: Neutralizing Foreigners


NOTE: Check out our latest installment on Publius Pundit, where we reveal some devastating per capita GDP data that will have the Russian nationalists tearing their hair out. The U.S. is #8 on the list for 2007, rising from #10 in 1992, displacing both Germany and Japan to take the #1 position in the world among the major nations. Pathetic Russia doesn’t even make the top 50, and is even lower when judged on the basis of “purchasing power parity,” while the U.S. is even higher. Nice job, Mr. Putin. Keep up the good work!

NOTE: The month of January, 2008, was this blog’s best month ever for traffic. We were visited 19,739 times last month, an average of 630 times per day, and our web pages were accessed 29,053 times (these are conservative figures according to SiteMeter; according to StatCounter, it was 20,235 visits and 29,318 pages accessed). As we’ve said many times before, these are the accomplishments of you the reader as much as they are of the contributors.

Another Original LR Translation: Humped and Dumped (by our Original Translator)

Prologue: It seems that Nashi has now served its purpose to the Kremlin and is going the way of all things, before it becomes too confident and hence threatening to the insecure but nonetheless malignant little troll who struts upon the Kremlin’s parapets. We predicted some time ago, in a translation of Nashi’s bizarre call for middle managers that Nashi would not make good on its promise to help all its young “volunteer management trainees” get jobs in “major Russian corporations.” In this regard, the following piece establishes that Nashi has now shown itself to be nothing more than a classic Russian pyramid scheme, just like the infamous MMM. (Remember them?). The authors of the following piece devastatingly refute any positive interpretation of why Nashi was disbanded – for example as some kind of a move away from the Putinjugend model, maybe because of Medvedev being named as his successor. This is nothing but: (a) a tactical move, to save the Kremlin a pile of money that Putin and Co. can then sock away in their Swiss bank accounts; (b) a strategic move, for making the group less obviously tied to the Kremlin, so it can become even more violent and cruel; and (c) a cynical loss of interest by the crass manipulators who used to run the organization, who never had any long-term vision for Russia at all, only for themselves.

Humped and Dumped

Yezhednevniy Zhurnal

January 29, 2008

The youth movement NASHI ["us slavic Russians"] is ending its existence as a centralized, federation-wide project. The leader of the organization, Nikita Borovik, announced to the newspaper “Kommersant” that the regional leaders of Nashi decided at a recent conference to preserve only five of their previous 50 regional offices – in Vladimir, Ivanov, Tulskiy, Voronezh, and Yaroslav. Activists from other regions will still be allowed to participate in special Nashi projects (“Our Army”, “Volunteer Youth Brigade”, Orthodox Corps”, Lessons in Friendship”, etc.). Sources in the Kremlin told the newspaper that there were no longer any plans use Nashi activists actively for political purposes, and Nashi-generated crowds would not be needed in the coming elections. Still, there would be no “formal closing” of Nashi, according to the Presidential Administration: the authorities would not leave the young people “unsupervised”. A portion of the group’s financing would also remain – like the 10 million rubles allotted for the group’s traditional summer camp at Lake Seliger. So what has long been predicted has finally come to pass: the big, bad old men used the starry-eyed little Nashisti for their own PR purposes, and now… “Thanks for the memories, goodbye.” Experts are certain that Borovikov’s announcement is only the “first cut”, and eventually the remaining five offices will also be closed, and financing for the group will be completely cut off.

———–

Sergey Udaltsov, Communist Youth Avant-garde (AKM):

For me personally, the news came as no surprise. I have long expected it. From the moment the Nashi movement was created, as with many others like it, it was obvious to me and a lot of other people that the movement was contrived, temporary and in essence something of a commercial project, especially for the movement’s leaders, who I suspect have already received their due dividends. Most significantly, from the very beginning this group had no discernible ideology; just support for the president and his policies – essentially apologia for the authorities and forceful suppression of all their opponents; no ideology or anything resembling it here, just storm troopers.

Hence, everything that is happening here is to be expected, with plenty of precedent: recall the movement “Walking Together” (Iduschiye Vmeste), which also lasted a few years and then passed away, and which almost no one remembers today. Following its demise, “Walking Together” was essentially reincarnated as “Nashi”, but I think this time we are seeing something other than re-branding: there will be no successor organization. What happened was that Nashi had accumulated such an aggressive image that the authorities themselves came to see that the continued existence of such a movement carried with it more minuses that plusses, especially considering how negatively it was viewed from abroad. I think this is the reason they are now closing it down. Although, of course, the sacred pedestal never remains vacant for long: new people will appear, young and ambitious, wishing to build their careers and businesses upon it. There will be successors of some sort, but I think they will be of a different sort than we see today.

Besides the negative image there is other reason the movement was closed: the people who headed Nashi had already gotten everything they wanted from it. Mr. Yakemenko has essentially joined the government, and a string of Nashi functionaries have landed in the Duma (parliament) – after which they just lost interest. Hence, on the one hand Nashi was no longer needed by the Kremlin, and on the other was no longer needed by its own leadership: everything they wanted, they had already gotten out of it, and as far as they were concerned, I think, the rank and file could just go to hell.

———–

Ilya Barabanov, journalist/correspondent, The New Times

In the end they will not completely close “Nashi”. Why? Because it is much easier, having cut off their financing, to simply keep them alive as a small and, at first glance, hardly visible group of assets, ones that can be called upon when the need arises to advance certain interests. Nashi as a large bureaucratic machine required too much financial investment. And the absence of any connection to a political party made their activities look to everyone like the work of the Presidential Administration.

This image was advanced as well by regular meetings between the movement’s leaders and first Vladimir Putin then Vladislav Surkov. Considering the absurdity of most of Nashi’s activities, its very existence, far from helping, actually hurt the image of the authorities. The group “Young Russia” (Rossiya Molodaya) presents a more beneficial structure for the Administration. Their actions are not viewed as being those of Surkov, so they can permit themselves to be throwbacks/barbarians (“otmorozheniye”).

Having chopped up Nashi into a series of smaller subgroups, the movement’s handlers in the Administration can still use these assets in the future for more pointed and radical actions, since in the eyes of the mass media and public opinion the Kremlin bureaucrats will not be responsible for them. More simply put: small, impersonalized structures, which no one associates with Surkov, Putin or his successor, are much more useful than one huge money-sucking monster committing outrages in front of the Estonian embassy.

So the Nashi movement will continue, in the form of a series of small groups, and one can anticipate their radicalization. The destruction of Nashi is simply the destruction of a corrupt bureaucratic machine. Put in economic terms, the Kremlin bureaucrats are optimizing their assets. And it will hardly affect their colleagues from “Young Russia” at all. The Kremlin ideologues will always need for one purpose or another a group of thugs (“otmoroziki”), ready at any moment to pick up crowbars and baseball bats. It’s a little more complicated with the “Young Guards” (Molodaya Gvardiya). After the December elections, their reason for existence will have disappeared. I think they can expect a slow death, beginning immediately after the presidential elections. The authorities will stop funding them – and as soon as they stop giving them money, the kids will skedaddle.

The Moscow Times, however, reports that Nashi may not be fully on board with the Kremlin’s plans. Has Putin created a Frankenstein even he can’t control?

Pro-Kremlin youth group Nashi said Friday that it was seeking to double its membership this year and dismissed reports of its imminent demise. Nashi leader Nikita Borovikov said at a news conference that while the group was undergoing a reorganization, it was not drifting into irrelevance. “No one can stop us,” Borovikov said.

Kommersant and Vedomosti, citing Nashi members and sources in the presidential administration, reported recently that Nashi was becoming obsolete after United Russia swept to a landslide victory in the Dec. 2 State Duma elections. Borovikov said the reports were part of a campaign to discredit the group by “small movements” and “individual politicians who have disappeared from the political skyline.” He did not specify which groups or politicians were behind the purported campaign.

Part of Nashi’s reorganization includes transferring power to regional centers to implement various projects, including Mishki, or Bear Cubs, a patriotic children’s group under the Nashi auspices, Borovikov said. Nashi intends to organize rallies in Moscow and St. Petersburg with 100,000 activists, as well as send 1,000 activists to Grozny to support reconstruction projects in the Chechen capital, Borovikov said. Nashi members are also working on the presidential campaign of Dmitry Medvedev in the March 2 election. Medvedev, expected to win in a landslide, has the backing of President Vladimir Putin, to whom Nashi has pledged fealty.


EDITORIAL: The Beetroot Republic

EDITORIAL

The Beetroot Republic

Without exaggeration, Russia is a country of legal nihilism.
No European country can boast of such disregard for law.”


Perhaps you are asking yourselves what sort of malignant russophobe might have made the above comment. Surely, perhaps you are saying, it’s a person whose views on Russia can’t be credited or trusted, so blind are they with irrational hatred of the Russian population.

Perhaps it is so. But if it is, then you must direct your cards and letters of protest to the Kremlin, attention of the heir apparent to the Russian throne, Dmitri Medvedev. For he was the speaker, as reported by the Moscow Times, talking to a group of NGO leaders at a conference known as “Civic Forum.”

It may help your burning blood to be told, however, that Medvedev apparently believes that upon entering the Kremlin’s walls all its occupants are rendered magically immune from this Russian infection. Thus, the rampant illegality which goes on outside is merely an obvious justification to vest those inside with ever greater levels of power and discretion, the better to make all Russia’s evil-doers understand the error of their ways. Isn’t that convenient?

The man is pond scum. Actually, perhaps we should retract that. It’s clearly an unnecessary personal insult.

To pond scum.


Faithful readers of this blog may remember our re-edited presentation last September of an article from Novaya Gazeta, one of the last bastion’s of freedom left in Russia, regarding Manana Aslamazyan (pictured), director of the Educated Media Fund NGO, an organization which sought to train Russian journalists in the basic elements of their craft — things they can’t learn, you see, in universities run by the Kremlin from teachers educated under Brezhnev. As NG wrote, describing a meeting between Vladimir Putin and a group of Russian journalists:

It will be remembered that a criminal case was started against Ms. Aslamazyan at the beginning of this year on the allegation of smuggling. Investigators say that when returning to Russia from Paris Ms. Aslamazyan didn’t declare in the technically correct manner the sum of 9,550 euros and 5,000 roubles. A criminal case was started and all of the Fund’s documentation was arrested after which the Fund declared a temporary suspension of its activity. Ms. Aslamazyan is abroad at the moment.

The head of Glasnost Protection Fund and also the acting chair of Educated Media Fund Alexei Simonov believes that the President hadn’t expected to have that conversation. But being reminded of the gist of the matter, Putin said “she may come back to Russia. Of course, no one can release her from administrative responsibility for this mistake. But mistake and crime shouldn’t be confused.”

Having learnt in more details about the Fund’s work, Putin expressed his view that the Fund, being sponsored with foreign money, cannot teach our journalists anything good. Nevertheless, presidential press secretary Alexei Gromov confirmed the guarantees made by Putin, asking to give advance notice about the date of arrival of the head of Educated Media Fund to Russia so that she wouldn’t be detained at the border. Later the President returned to this topic about Ms. Aslamazyan when talking privately to Nikolai Svanidze. It sounded like a joke, but it sounded like “let her come back while I’m still President” Svanidze said.

And yet, last week NG reported that Tverskoi District Court in Moscow had confirmed the ability of Putin’s prosecutors press forward with criminal charges, after the Kremlin closed down her office and forced her to flee the country. The criminal case, in other words, continues apace. Aslamazyan had accidentally miscalculated the exchange rate between euros and dollars and thought she had an amount that was not subject to declaration. The Kremlin would have us believe that this incident just “happened” to occur at the exact moment when it raided her NGO and shut it down (Putin himself confirming that he did not want Russians being taught journalism by foreigners).

NG says that Aslamazyan’s attorney is unable to determine what sort of charges have been preferred against his client, and a letter of protest against her mistreatment has been signed by 2,500 Russian journalists only to be totally ignored by the Kremlin. That’s to say nothing of the word of the nation’s president. Aslamazyan tells NG: “I just cannot return and frankly speaking I am afraid of doing it, as the whole matter is being prolonged for some reason. The situation has reached an impasse.”

Is it possible that Vladimir Putin, the president of a G-8 country, lied to the press when he told them Aslamazyan could return to Russia without fear of persecution other than an administrative fine over the currency issue? Was he saying that simply to lure her back, allowing his goons to pounce upon her when she arrived?

Such a thing would be unheard of in modern world history. It would indicate that Russia is governed by a clan of baboons, who are willing to utterly disregard even the pretense of legality, in the manner of the mafia, whenever it suits their fancy. Not even the leaders of the USSR engaged in such brazen activity — they probably knew the story of the boy who cried “wolf!” and realized that they could not hope to to conduct international affairs if their word had been pulverized as to all credibility.

Last week, a Swiss court ruled that Russia is officially a banana republic — or perhaps that is an insult to banana republics, and we should coin a new term for what Russia is, perhaps “beetroot republic” would do. After all, a banana is a colorful, tropical, happy-tasting fruit, while a beetroot is a dirty, scraggly, somber, dour looking vegetable nobody likes. The Swiss court determined, as reported in the Moscow Times, that “a former executive at a state-owned company can not be handed over for trial in Russia without a guarantee that conditions for his detention will meet standards set by the European Convention on Human Rights. The defendant, who was not named in the ruling after requesting anonymity, has called the fraud charges filed in the Russian courts politically motivated.” In other words, Russia is simply too uncivilized, Switzerland would feel too guilty about sending a person into its judicial sausage grinder, and it won’t dirty its hands that way. Remember, this is Switzerland, the most famous neutral country in the world.

Things are so far gone in Russia now that it’s impossible to tell whether a given act taken by the Kremlin’s forces is motivated by evil geopolitics or simply corruption gone amok. As Michael Weiss writes in the Weekly Standard of the British Council attack:

One theory popular among Putin’s domestic enemies is that the FSB is quite happy to level charges of espionage and “provocation” at so harmless an outfit as the British Council because its own agents desire to live in England. (Lavrov’s daughter studied there, as have the children of so many other Kremlin officials.) After all, the greater the supposed threat posed by Her Majesty’s Secret Service, the more spies from the other sides are required for surveillance and counterintelligence. Many a grizzled KGB agent has reminisced about his cushy Andropov-era posting near the Thames, and it should come as no surprise that, in a country ruled by ex-KGB agents, there is still the willingness to manipulate national security to obtain la dolce vita. Bottomless accusations against the British Council therefore play into a much larger scheme of what might be called siloviki self-gratification. And that’s enough to make even a dispassionate observer sick without polonium.”

So Medvedev couldn’t have been more right. Without exaggeration, Russia is a country of legal nihilism. No European country can boast of such disregard for law. He just forgot to add that, with still less exaggeration, one can say that those in Russia with the least respect of all for the province of the law are the malignant little trolls, and most of all their Troll King, who dwell within the Kremlin’s walls and strut upon its parapets, as naked as the Emperor with his New Clothes, waiting gleefully for yet another Russian apocalypse.

A New Low in Neo-Soviet Hypocrisy

Other Russia reports:

Russia’s Central Electoral Commission (CEC) has challenged the income declarations of three Russian presidential candidates, Interfax reports. Contenders are required to turn in a list of incomes and assets to the Commission, which then makes the information public. The CEC oversees elections, and is responsible for registering candidates.

According to the electoral body, only Dmitri Medvedev, the chosen successor of President Vladimir Putin, was accurate in his filings. Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, allegedly withheld 12 million 638 thousand rubles (€349,414 or $516, 083) worth of investments, and a 25 thousand ruble salary from the Moscow State Open University. According to tax records, the candidate also owns a 574 square meter plot of land in the Saratov oblast.

Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov allegedly left of the value of presents received from the “Patrons of Art of Century” International Welfare Fund. The total value is estimated at 17,084 rubles (€472 or $697).

Andrei Bogdanov, of the Democratic Party failed to declare the Moscow apartment of his wife, Irina. The CEC notes that the couple has joint ownership of the 64.3 square meter flat.

The fourth and final candidate, Dmitri Medvedev, apparently filed everything correctly. Political experts had earlier scoffed at his paperwork, which states that the First Deputy Prime Minister earns just $71,000 per year. The candidate holds a second job as chairman of Gazprom, Russia’s natural gas monopoly, from which no income was declared. The company earned $13 billion in profits for 2006. According to the records, Medvedev also doesn’t own a car, and shares his wife’s 9-year-old Volkswagen Golf.

The Commission reiterated that it will not revoke the registrations of any of the candidates. However, the information will be published in the agency’s informational posters, and may be publicly embarrassing.

One candidate, Zyuganov, has questioned the allegations. “I am astonished at such a remark, because I didn’t receive any presents from the “Patrons of Art of Century” International Welfare Fund,” he told Interfax. “This fund bestowed me with its award for helping orphanages, and I was given a folder and booklet about the fund’s activities. That’s all that I can say.”

Ukraine, Georgia to Join in Anti-Russia Gas Axis

Vladimir Socor of the Jamestown Foundation reports in his latest e-mail:

Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko has proposed that the European Union and Ukraine join a project for a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan via the Caspian Sea, South Caucasus, and Black Sea to Ukraine and EU territory. Tymoshenko termed this concept “White Stream” when presenting it to top EU officials during her January 28-29 visit to Brussels. It re-launches a concept originally outlined by Tymoshenko in 2005 during her first premiership to reduce Ukraine’s and the EU’s dependence on Russian-delivered gas at Russian-defined prices.

White Stream is coincidentally the brand name of a project outlined by the London-based GUEU White Stream Pipeline Company, with Georgian participation. It was presented last July at an energy conference in Tbilisi and again last October at the Energy Security Conference of heads of state and governments in Vilnius. The GUEU’s (Georgia-Ukraine-European Union) White Stream envisages a first-stage pipeline for Azerbaijani gas, via Georgia and the seabed of the Black Sea to the Crimea, with two options to reach Central Europe: either via Ukrainian or Romanian pipelines. White Stream’s second stage would carry Turkmen gas via Azerbaijan and Georgia to Europe across the Black Sea.

The two concepts clearly dovetail with each other, but there is no sign that they are coordinating with each other. Such lack of coordination could become mutually counterproductive. The same risk arises from insufficient communication by either group of transport planners with the gas producers in Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

Originally a Georgian initiative, the London-based project has resulted in an engineering blueprint for the seabed section, which is the most challenging on the proposed pipeline route. White Stream envisages transporting Caspian gas — from Azerbaijan in the first stage and Turkmenistan in the second — through a pipeline that would branch off in Georgia from the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas export pipeline. The branch would become feasible, once the second phase of field development reaches full volume at Azerbaijan’s Shah-Deniz field. The Georgian pipeline section would run overland for approximately 100 kilometers, from a point west of Borjomi to the Black Sea coast near Supsa.

From there, the pipeline is projected to run some 650 kilometers in ultra-deep waters to Ukraine’s Crimean shore near Feodosiya, then cross the Crimean peninsula for some 250 kilometers, with two continuation options possible: either connecting with Ukraine’s mainland pipeline system, or continuing on the seabed to the Romanian coast for some 300 kilometers in shallow waters.

Several European engineers who had formerly worked for the Italian ENI/Saipem on the construction of the world’s deepest seabed pipeline, Blue Stream, are said to participate in GUEU’s White Stream project. White Stream’s deep-water construction would benefit from the technical experience gained when laying the ENI-Gazprom Blue Stream seabed line from Russia to Turkey. The White Stream project envisages using a J-lay barge of the same type as that used by ENI/Saipem, which was key to that technological accomplishment.

Ukraine is as indispensable as Georgia to this project. Tymoshenko outlined a Ukrainian vision of White Stream in Brussels to European Commission President Manuel Barroso, other top EU officials, and at a hearing in the European Parliament. Noting with concern that several pipelines currently under construction would increase the EU’s supply-dependence and price-dependence on Russia, Tymoshenko called for direct EU involvement in construction of oil and gas corridors via the Caspian and Black Seas, directly to Europe.

Tymoshenko underscored that this concept is closely interrelated with Ukraine’s goal to import oil and gas directly from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and provide transit for these commodities to EU territory. The trans-Black Sea pipeline would be key to Ukraine’s goal to cut dependence on Gazprom and its notorious intermediary RosUkrEnergo, she told the EU leaders. She urged them to proceed with the necessary investment decisions now, rather than waiting for “another 20 years.”

Ukraine can offer the spare capacity of its transit pipelines, which are underloaded already and will be substantially underutilized if Russia carries out its plans to reroute large gas export volumes from Ukrainian to other pipeline routes.

Given the latest Russian-inflicted setbacks to the EU’s Nabucco project, Tymoshenko portrayed the Ukrainian concept of White Stream in Brussels as a possible alternative to Nabucco. Such a conclusion is premature, however. Nabucco and the two dovetailing versions of White Stream are all necessary in order to stimulate Western investment in extraction in the Central Asian upstream as well as acceleration of production in Azerbaijan. Absent these transport options and the markets along their routes, Caspian gas production growth would slow down; and existing Russian pipelines would absorb growing volumes of that production, to the economic and strategic detriment of Europe. The GUEU and Ukrainian versions of the White Stream project need to proceed in synergy with each other and in coordination with Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

Once Again, Putin’s Russia Thumbs its Nose at International Law

The Beeb reports that even as it shrieked and howled about Britain’s refusal to extradite Boris Berezovsky, Russia was all along (secretly yet, as if it were ashamed) hiding the family of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic:

Russia granted refugee status to the wife and son of the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, the country’s immigration service has admitted. The two were given the status in March 2005, Russian officials said. Marko Milosevic left for Russia in 2000 after his father resigned. His mother Mirjana Markovic followed in 2003 when she came under investigation. Both are the subject of international arrest warrants issued by Serbia for charges including alleged fraud. One Serbian probe was set up to investigate allegations that they led an international cigarette smuggling ring. Mirjana Markovic [pictured] was considered a power behind the scenes during her husband’s rule in the 1990s. The Russian immigration service said she and her son were granted refugee status because of the threat to their lives in Serbia. Slobodan Milosevic died in his cell at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague in March 2006, where he was facing war crimes charges. Fearing arrest on embezzlement charges, neither his widow nor his son attended his funeral in Serbia.

Once Again, Putin’s Russia Thumbs its Nose at International Law

The Beeb reports that even as it shrieked and howled about Britain’s refusal to extradite Boris Berezovsky, Russia was all along (secretly yet, as if it were ashamed) hiding the family of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic:

Russia granted refugee status to the wife and son of the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, the country’s immigration service has admitted. The two were given the status in March 2005, Russian officials said. Marko Milosevic left for Russia in 2000 after his father resigned. His mother Mirjana Markovic followed in 2003 when she came under investigation. Both are the subject of international arrest warrants issued by Serbia for charges including alleged fraud. One Serbian probe was set up to investigate allegations that they led an international cigarette smuggling ring. Mirjana Markovic [pictured] was considered a power behind the scenes during her husband’s rule in the 1990s. The Russian immigration service said she and her son were granted refugee status because of the threat to their lives in Serbia. Slobodan Milosevic died in his cell at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague in March 2006, where he was facing war crimes charges. Fearing arrest on embezzlement charges, neither his widow nor his son attended his funeral in Serbia.

Once Again, Putin’s Russia Thumbs its Nose at International Law

The Beeb reports that even as it shrieked and howled about Britain’s refusal to extradite Boris Berezovsky, Russia was all along (secretly yet, as if it were ashamed) hiding the family of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic:

Russia granted refugee status to the wife and son of the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, the country’s immigration service has admitted. The two were given the status in March 2005, Russian officials said. Marko Milosevic left for Russia in 2000 after his father resigned. His mother Mirjana Markovic followed in 2003 when she came under investigation. Both are the subject of international arrest warrants issued by Serbia for charges including alleged fraud. One Serbian probe was set up to investigate allegations that they led an international cigarette smuggling ring. Mirjana Markovic [pictured] was considered a power behind the scenes during her husband’s rule in the 1990s. The Russian immigration service said she and her son were granted refugee status because of the threat to their lives in Serbia. Slobodan Milosevic died in his cell at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague in March 2006, where he was facing war crimes charges. Fearing arrest on embezzlement charges, neither his widow nor his son attended his funeral in Serbia.

Once Again, Putin’s Russia Thumbs its Nose at International Law

The Beeb reports that even as it shrieked and howled about Britain’s refusal to extradite Boris Berezovsky, Russia was all along (secretly yet, as if it were ashamed) hiding the family of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic:

Russia granted refugee status to the wife and son of the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, the country’s immigration service has admitted. The two were given the status in March 2005, Russian officials said. Marko Milosevic left for Russia in 2000 after his father resigned. His mother Mirjana Markovic followed in 2003 when she came under investigation. Both are the subject of international arrest warrants issued by Serbia for charges including alleged fraud. One Serbian probe was set up to investigate allegations that they led an international cigarette smuggling ring. Mirjana Markovic [pictured] was considered a power behind the scenes during her husband’s rule in the 1990s. The Russian immigration service said she and her son were granted refugee status because of the threat to their lives in Serbia. Slobodan Milosevic died in his cell at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague in March 2006, where he was facing war crimes charges. Fearing arrest on embezzlement charges, neither his widow nor his son attended his funeral in Serbia.

Once Again, Putin’s Russia Thumbs its Nose at International Law

The Beeb reports that even as it shrieked and howled about Britain’s refusal to extradite Boris Berezovsky, Russia was all along (secretly yet, as if it were ashamed) hiding the family of Serbian war criminal Slobodan Milosevic:

Russia granted refugee status to the wife and son of the late Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic, the country’s immigration service has admitted. The two were given the status in March 2005, Russian officials said. Marko Milosevic left for Russia in 2000 after his father resigned. His mother Mirjana Markovic followed in 2003 when she came under investigation. Both are the subject of international arrest warrants issued by Serbia for charges including alleged fraud. One Serbian probe was set up to investigate allegations that they led an international cigarette smuggling ring. Mirjana Markovic [pictured] was considered a power behind the scenes during her husband’s rule in the 1990s. The Russian immigration service said she and her son were granted refugee status because of the threat to their lives in Serbia. Slobodan Milosevic died in his cell at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague in March 2006, where he was facing war crimes charges. Fearing arrest on embezzlement charges, neither his widow nor his son attended his funeral in Serbia.

Annals of the Neo-Soviet Crackdown on Journalism: The Final Countdown

The Wall Street Journal reports:

Michael McFaul and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss paint a demoralizing picture of Vladimir Putin’s relentless attack on democracy and the toll it has taken on Russian society (“Notable & Quotable,” Jan. 18). In the longer essay for Foreign Affairs from which the excerpt is taken (“The Myth of the Authoritarian Model,” Jan./Feb. 2008), the writers also emphasize how, instead of building “an orderly and highly capable state,” the Kremlin has focused on neutralizing independent media within — and outside of — Russia.

The Kremlin clearly has a comprehensive strategy to neutralize foreign broadcasters. Congressionally funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) and BBC World’s Russia service have seen a dramatic reduction in their broadcasting power. Though the trend has accelerated sharply in the past few years, the strategy to deploy these tactics was born as early as 2002 when Mr. Putin officially revoked the 1991 Yeltsin era decree that established RFE/RL’s presence in Moscow.

Foreign broadcasters rely on Russian partners to air their programming. From 27 partners in 2005 to only six today, the pressure on RFE/RL has been so intense that the “radios” are now revamping their Russia broadcasting strategy, turning to high-impact media that are less vulnerable to pressure. The Kremlin’s strategy is both nuanced — pressuring Russian affiliates — and reminiscent of Soviet-era tactics. Rather than inflicting one loud blow, affiliates are visited individually by the tax man, the health inspector or the local FSB media watchdog. Sometimes, journalists are beaten up and families are intimidated. One manager of a provincial affiliate that carried RFE/RL programming was called into the office of the local licensing authority and told that carrying RFE/RL programming could be considered an “unpatriotic act.”

In a significant blow to its broadcasting reach, BBC World’s Russia service lost its FM presence in Moscow earlier this year. German broadcaster Deutsche Welle has also had problems with its German and Russian-language medium-wave radio programs.

The pressure on domestic media has certainly paid off for the Kremlin. Russian media’s coverage of recent parliamentary elections practically neglected the opposition. Paris-based Reporters Without Borders expressed its “outrage” at the one-sided coverage. The OSCE concluded that “Russia had failed to meet press freedom commitments during the recent parliamentary election campaign.”

Even under these difficult circumstances, RFE/RL continued to air interviews with banned opposition figures and international observers. On election day, RFE/RL was unique in providing more than 50 reports on possible election fraud as it occurred around the country while Russian television provided almost no regional reporting until the end of the day.

Little can be done, apparently, to convince the Kremlin to allow a free and fair domestic media, which makes the mission of international, independent Russian language media all the more critical.

Diane Zeleny
Director of Communications
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
Prague

February 3, 2008 – Contents

SUNDAY FEBRUARY 3 CONTENTS

(1) The Sunday Travel Section

(2) The Sunday Stalin

(3) The Sunday Foreboding

(4) The Sunday Cinema

(5) The Sunday Secret

(6) The Sunday Funnies

NOTE: We are especially proud to publish entry #1 above, a meticulously researched and sparklingly well-written essay from a blogger/reader with penetrating insights about real life in Russia. It’s an honor to receive submissions of this quality from within our community, humbling and all the compensation we need to continue our work. We’ve shelved our regular Sunday Photos feature this week in order to let this wonderful piece of work have the lead position. We’re quite sure there are more of you out there who can do this sort of thing, so perhaps this will give you the encouragement you need to set pen to paper. It’s a big country, somebody’s got to write it! One point that can’t be overlooked in reading it is that these words could easily have been written by a “Russian patriot” who actually wants foreigners to stay as far away from Russia as possible, just as well as by a real Russian patriot who wants the country to reform and improve. Those are the depths to which neo-Soviet Russia has brought itself.

NOTE: Robert Amsterdam has announced that his client Mikhail Khodorkovsky has launched a hunger strike in support of his embattled colleague to whom the Kremlin is denying essential medical treatment. It’s a new low in Putin’s barbarism.

NOTE: A reader writes — “
In the last year I read a thriller fiction book about a contemporary Romanov who put into motion a plot to become a modern Czar of Russia. Throw into the mix a US cop who is taking care of his fragile sister and a smart journalist who lives in Paris. Add that the sister is also the woman who the to-be Czar selects to be his Czarina. Murder, espionage and global intrigue made for a compelling read. Problem is…. I can’t remember the author or the name of the book?” Can anyone help her out?