La Russophobe

Congratulations to Us!

September 1, 2006 · 8 Comments


Last night, La Russophobe broke into the top 100,000 blogs in the world out of the tens of millions tracked by Technorati, the world’s leading blog data source, based on link activity. Right now, Technorati says La Russophobe is the 99,706th most influential blog in the world. Being in the top 100,000 means that Technorati will start providing extra tracking data about La Russophobe’s traffic and will treat the blog as being among the elite. Look for some tracking information on the readership to be posted here tomorrow for reader edification.

La Russophobe hasn’t even had her five-month anniversary yet! Given that this blog is devoted exclusively to one topic, and isn’t even half a year old, this news proves how important that topic is. We broke into the top 200,000 blogs at the beginning of the month, and we are honored to be counted among the top 0.2% of all blogs worldwide, a testament to the importance of blogging democratic values where Russia is concerned. Congratulations to us. And by “us” we mean YOU who are reading these words, because YOU are a part of this community and YOU are responsible for making us what we are today. The readers are every bit as important as the writers. This blog’s significance is a testament to the fact that there is a large community in the world which is deeply concerned by the rise of the Neo-Soviet Union in Russia and which wishes to do what is possible to avoid another century of woe both in Russia and outside it.

La Russophobe warmly thanks all those who have supplied us with content, comments and readership and congratulates all of us on a job well done. But we have no illusions. There is a long hard slog ahead of us and we have only just begun. Still, it’s a fine start!

Categories: russia

Exposing the Horrors of Russian Imperialism in Chechnya

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Sean’s Russia Blog contains a fantastic double post on Chechnya, the first documenting the obscene failure of the Russian people to demand honesty from their goverment concerning the ongoing military casualities being suffered in the region, and the other documenting, based on a New York Times story, the horrors of the Kremlin-sponsored Kadyrov regime that governs the region (the article appears in full below). As Sean brilliantly and succinctly puts it: “It seems that Kadyrov’s Chechnya is turning out to be no different than the late Shamil Basaev’s would have been.” Russia will only become a great country when it realizes that this is the statement of a true Russian patriot and make a hero out of the speaker instead of trying to silence him.

Right now, Showtime network is airing its breathtaking documentary “Three Days in September” narrated by Julia Roberts (click the link for video clips, photos and other information). Catch it if you have not seen it already, it is truly a harrowing work of genius. It tells the story of the Beslan hostage tragedy and tells viewers many facts the Kremlin would like them to forget. For example, that there was only one meeting between the terrorists and the government during the four days of the crisis; that Putin spent virtually no time in Beslan when he visited in the aftermath and did not go to the site at all (the pictures of Putin’s cold, shark-like eyes as he visits the wounded in their hospital beds is perfectly ghastly); that one of the terrorists helped save the life of one of the children during the frenzied attack by government forces; that the government needed nearly half a day to subdue the two-dozen terrorists in the building; and that the government lied brazenly during the crisis about how many children were inside. People outside Russia know more about the crisis than the Russians themselves, because the Russian people choose to close their eyes to the outrageous actions of their government. The same is true for what goes on inside Chechnya.

If the Russian people sit in craven silence allowing both civilians and soldiers to be butchered in secrecy, not even knowing the correct number of their casualties, if they will not protect their children, then who can feel sympathy for them as they plummet into the abyss?

Here is the New York Times piece cited by Sean Guillory in full (a ghastly video presentation is available for those with strong stomachs, click here to watch):

ARGUN, Russia, Aug. 26 — The humiliation of Malika Soltayeva, a pregnant Chechen woman suspected of adultery, was ferocious and swift.

Ms. Soltayeva, 23, had been away from home for a month and was reported missing by her family. When she returned, her husband accused her of infidelity and banished her from their apartment. The local authorities found her at her aunt’s residence. They said they had a few questions.

What followed was no investigation. In a law enforcement compound in this town in east-central Chechnya, the men who served as Argun’s police sheared away her hair and her eyebrows and painted her scalp green, the color associated with Islam. A thumb-thick cross was smeared on her brow.

Ms. Soltayeva, a Muslim, had slept with a Christian Russian serviceman, they said. Her scarlet letter would be an emerald cross. She was forced to confess, ordered to strip, and beaten with wooden rods and hoses on her buttocks, arms, legs, hands, stomach and back. “Turn and be condemned by Allah,” one of her tormentors said, demanding that she position herself so he could strike her more squarely.

The torture of Ms. Soltayeva, recorded on a video obtained by The New York Times, and other recent brutish acts and instances of religious policing, raise questions about Chechnya’s direction.

Since 2004, the war in Chechnya has tilted sharply in the Kremlin’s favor, as open combat with separatists has declined in intensity and frequency. Moscow now administers the republic and fights the remaining insurgency largely through paramilitary forces led by Ramzan A. Kadyrov, the powerful young Chechen premier.

Mr. Kadyrov’s public persona is flamboyantly pro-Russian. He praises President Vladimir V. Putin and has pledged to rebuild Chechnya and lead it back to the Kremlin’s fold. “I cannot tell you how great my love for Russia is,” he said in an interview this year.

But beneath this publicly professed loyalty, some of Chechnya’s indigenous security forces — with their evident anti-Slavic racism, institutionalized brutality, culture of impunity and intolerant interpretation of a pre-medieval Islamic code — have demonstrated the vicious behavior that Russia has said its latest invasion of Chechnya, in 1999, was supposed to stop.

Human rights groups and Chechen civilians say that these security forces’ ambitions and loyalties are uncertain and that their actions are unchecked. The republic’s course, they say, is dangerous for Russians and Chechens alike.

Few people have yet compared the current disorder with the end of the brief period of Chechen autonomy, in the late 1990’s, when rebels and foreign Islamic mercenaries operated terrorist training camps in the forests, and when Islamic courts sentenced criminals to execution by firing squads, which were broadcast on Chechen television news. But Mr. Kadyrov’s police and security forces, known as kadyrovsty, are staffed mostly with uneducated young men, some of whom have been fighting for years, including many former rebels who have changed sides.

Recent videos of their conduct, provided to The New York Times by outraged Chechens, show an unsettling pattern.

One shows a man and a woman in the town of Shali, each married to someone else, who were suspected of flirting in a car this summer. The police swarmed around the couple, jeering at them, and directed the man to kick the woman. The couple was then forced to dance a brief lezginka, a traditional and often sexually charged dance. The police kicked the woman, too, and pulled her scarf and hair.

Although the faces of several of the officers are clear, they have yet to come under investigation by higher authorities.

Another instance of unrestrained behavior occurred in late July in Kurchaloi, when one of Mr. Kadyrov’s units killed a rebel, Akhmad Dushayev, and beheaded his body. The severed head was displayed on a pipe in the town’s center, residents said in interviews.

Videos show that, later, the kadyrovsty, many in police uniforms, casually amused themselves with the head, joking as they displayed it in a garage. Another video shows the head adorned with a cap and with a cigarette in its mouth.

Residents said the police justified the beheading by saying that Mr. Dushayev had previously cut off the head of a pro-Kremlin Chechen fighter, and that the vengeance was fair play. Ms. Soltayeva’s own experience, much of which was captured on video, was an accumulation of terror, pain and loss.

She was seized March 19, and mocked throughout a torture session that lasted nearly two hours. “Call for Sergei!” one of the policemen said, using the name of her assumed lover as he beat her. “Sergei! Help!”

Next they told her to dress, and drove her to her husband’s courtyard and made her dance before her neighbors. “Look how ugly you are,” another policeman said.

When she staggered away, several of them kicked her with their heavy black boots. Two days later she miscarried, and has been largely out of public view since.

The episode, which took place five months ago, was not investigated, even though videos showing the torture were passed along on cellphones throughout Argun and other Chechen towns. The videos circulated widely enough that accurate details of her abuse were known by roughly half of the Chechens interviewed by The New York Times.

“It is just outrageous lawlessness,” Ms. Soltayeva said in an interview in Grozny, Chechnya’s capital.

As is common in crumbling marriages, the details of Ms. Soltayeva’s family life and behavior are in dispute. Her former husband’s family says she had an affair with a Russian serviceman she met at a store where she worked as a cashier. She says that she did not, and that she was faithful to her husband even though he beat her.

Her whereabouts in the weeks leading up to her beating are also a source of contention. Ms. Soltayeva said she was away from home because she had been abducted by masked men who eventually released her, a phenomenon in Chechnya that is common enough that her own family says they believe her. Her husband’s family, and the police, say that she left Chechnya to try to live with her Russian lover, and that she returned when it did not work out.

Natalya Estemirova, a staff member at the Grozny office of Memorial, a private human rights group, said she tried to bring the case to the Chechen authorities, but they threatened Ms. Soltayeva with criminal charges for falsely claiming to have been kidnapped. They showed no interest in the police violence, she said.

Allegations of state-sponsored horrors, and claims that Russian and Chechen officials have allowed servicemen to commit crimes with impunity, have been a regular accompaniment to the Chechen wars.

Human rights groups have documented mass graves, extralegal executions, widespread use and tolerance of torture, illegal detention, rape, robbery and kidnapping.

Some cases have seemed a matter of policy, as when suspected rebel supporters have been abducted during police and military sweeps. Other cases appeared to flow from the rage, drunkenness or frustration of ordinary soldiers fighting a savage guerrilla war.

What has made several recent cases different is that many of the kadyrovsty, unsophisticated gunmen who have had little contact with the world beyond Chechnya, have acquired cellphones with small video cameras and have casually, even gleefully, recorded their own crimes.

The video sequences are then shared, multiplying as they swiftly pass from phone to phone. In a long interview earlier this year, Mr. Kadyrov said that his units were being professionalized and that the armed men under his command integrated into formal government structures. He insisted that they would be able to provide security and competent policing.

[On Aug. 29, The Times provided Mr. Kadyrov’s office with four videos of Ms. Soltayeva’s torture. Mr. Kadyrov said through a spokeswoman that upon viewing them he had ordered the Chechen Interior Ministry to investigate. “Criminal charges will be brought against all responsible for this,” said the spokeswoman, Tatyana Georgiyeva.]

Ms. Estemirova said that the unit in Argun that seized Ms. Soltayeva had been formally disbanded in the spring, but that its members were simply transferred into new “professional” battalions, known as North and South.

“They were assimilated into North and South and never checked by prosecutors,” she said. “Now they are more difficult to arrest.”

Categories: russia

Annals of Cold War II: Lugar Rips Russian Weaponizing of Energy

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

In an icy blast delivered at a prestigious U.S. conference on energy, Senator Richard Lugar has equated Russia with U.S. energy foes Iran and Venezuela as “hostile regimes” where U.S. energy security is concerned. Drunk on arrogance and oil, Russia has provoked the United States into a second cold war and the consequences for Russia are inevitable and unavoidable. Kommersant reports:

The new charges against Russia were heard on Tuesday in West Lafayette, Indiana, at the so-called energy summit held under the patronage of Perdue University and Sen. Lugar. Major figures on the energy market and eminent experts on energy were present. The main topic of discussion was energy resources and their use in foreign policy. Lugar set the tone for the conference in his speech about challenges and threats. He is a 74-year-old veteran politician who was first elected to the Senate in 1976.

In his list of threats to U.S. national energy security, Lugar listed “hostile regimes, from Venezuela to Iran and Russia” neat the top, saying that they consciously use energy levers to pressure their neighbors. By placing Moscow in the same category as Tehran and Caracas, Lugar practically placed the Russian authorities on the same level as the regimes in those two countries. “We are used to thinking in terms of conventional warfare,” Lugar said, “but now energy is becoming the preferred weapon in the hands of those who have it.” Lugar called on U.S. authorities to develop a new national policy for energy resources to escape to avoid the “geopolitical threat from oil-rich regimes.”

Another entry on Lugar’s list of six basic threats was authoritarian regimes that control the production and delivery of oil within their own countries. The money those receive from the sales of energy resources feeds corruption, Lugar said. As a consequence, a retreat from democracy happens in the best case and, in the worst case, the petrodollars are spend on the support of international terrorism. The senator was particularly upset by the fact that the U.S., by continuing to import oil from those countries, is contributing to the problem. “Our economic health depends on forces that are located far beyond the limits of our control, including in hostile countries,” he summarized. Although the senator did not list those hostile countries again, the same states that were listed earlier fell within his description.

What Lugar left unsaid was filled in by another participant in the conference, Rice University researcher Emmy Meyers- Jaff. “Bolivia, Venezuela and the Middle East are unstable regions,” she said. “And then there is Russia, where oil fields are being taken away from companies that have legally acquired the rights to produce oil. That happens when someone close to President Putin wants to make money himself. So remember, when you buy a gas-guzzling Hummer, you are voluntarily putting yourself in their hands,” she said.

The massive criticism of Russia is one response to concept of energy security proposed by Russia at the G8 summit. The American energy elite has made it clear that it does not consider Russia a guarantor of energy security, but a threat to it.

The four other threats to American energy security did not elicit as great a level of response at the conference. They concerned global warming, natural disaster and price growth due to consumption by economic giants like India and China. Lugar considers the last point a threat because high energy prices strike at developing countries’ development, which often remain afloat only thanks to American aid.

Lugar’s speech shows not only that the U.S. has firm intentions of fighting for its energy security and interests, it also shows the American establishment’s position toward the Kremlin, both in the White House and in the Senate.

Ariel Cohen, senior analysts at the Heritage Foundation, told Kommersant that Lugar’s statements the widening front of supporters of a harsher policy toward Russia. Cohen included congressmen John McCain and Tom Lantos in that cohort. In Cohen’s opinion, Lugar’s joining the ranks is bad news for Moscow because of his closeness to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Another Kommersant source tied Lugar’s speech to the introduction of a document on the Senate on sanctions against French and Russian companies that do business with Iran.

A Kommersant source in the White House said that Lugar’s speech should not be taken as a new turn in U.S.-Russian relations, but as a continuation of old tendencies. “He didn’t say anything that U.S. Vice President Richard Cheney didn’t say in Vilnius,” the source noted. “Condoleezza Rice has been talking about the same things for a long time.” That source made it clear that the U.S. would no longer remain silent if Moscow’s behavior upsets it, and the uses of energy is just one of those things that upset it.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia’s Love Affair with Terror

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Here’s a hot one: Writing in Asia Times, Federico Bordonaro, “senior analyst” with something called the Power and Interest News Report, exposes the truly outrageous and horrifying nature of Russian support for global terrorism. He also documents the Kremlin’s consolidation of power. And his conclusion? It’s unbelievably this: Russia is only supporting international terrorism because of an inferiority complex engendered by the expansion of NATO. In other words, Russia got its feelings hurt in the 90s, that is why it is supporting global terrorism in the 00s. All we need to do to control these actions by Russia is to strike a “grand bargain” with Putin (you know, the same kind Chamberlain struck with Hitler), showing Russians that we love them and respect their opinions, and then they’ll become civilized. Psychological forces sure are at work here, but Mr. Bordonaro is their victim. It’s so much easier and more comfortable to think of the Putin regime as “misunderstood” than evil, isn’t it? That means all we have to do is be nicer to it and it will be nicer to us. On the other hand, if the Kremlin is dominated by a clan of crazed KGB functionaires steeped in hatred of the west and yearning for revenge not because of what happened after the USSR fell but because of the fall itself, that means we’re in for decades more cold war with the risk of a thermonuclear hot one. It’s the Chamberlain Complex: the preferred response among cowards is to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia’s Love Affair with Terror

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Here’s a hot one: Writing in Asia Times, Federico Bordonaro, “senior analyst” with something called the Power and Interest News Report, exposes the truly outrageous and horrifying nature of Russian support for global terrorism. He also documents the Kremlin’s consolidation of power. And his conclusion? It’s unbelievably this: Russia is only supporting international terrorism because of an inferiority complex engendered by the expansion of NATO. In other words, Russia got its feelings hurt in the 90s, that is why it is supporting global terrorism in the 00s. All we need to do to control these actions by Russia is to strike a “grand bargain” with Putin (you know, the same kind Chamberlain struck with Hitler), showing Russians that we love them and respect their opinions, and then they’ll become civilized. Psychological forces sure are at work here, but Mr. Bordonaro is their victim. It’s so much easier and more comfortable to think of the Putin regime as “misunderstood” than evil, isn’t it? That means all we have to do is be nicer to it and it will be nicer to us. On the other hand, if the Kremlin is dominated by a clan of crazed KGB functionaires steeped in hatred of the west and yearning for revenge not because of what happened after the USSR fell but because of the fall itself, that means we’re in for decades more cold war with the risk of a thermonuclear hot one. It’s the Chamberlain Complex: the preferred response among cowards is to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia’s Love Affair with Terror

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Here’s a hot one: Writing in Asia Times, Federico Bordonaro, “senior analyst” with something called the Power and Interest News Report, exposes the truly outrageous and horrifying nature of Russian support for global terrorism. He also documents the Kremlin’s consolidation of power. And his conclusion? It’s unbelievably this: Russia is only supporting international terrorism because of an inferiority complex engendered by the expansion of NATO. In other words, Russia got its feelings hurt in the 90s, that is why it is supporting global terrorism in the 00s. All we need to do to control these actions by Russia is to strike a “grand bargain” with Putin (you know, the same kind Chamberlain struck with Hitler), showing Russians that we love them and respect their opinions, and then they’ll become civilized. Psychological forces sure are at work here, but Mr. Bordonaro is their victim. It’s so much easier and more comfortable to think of the Putin regime as “misunderstood” than evil, isn’t it? That means all we have to do is be nicer to it and it will be nicer to us. On the other hand, if the Kremlin is dominated by a clan of crazed KGB functionaires steeped in hatred of the west and yearning for revenge not because of what happened after the USSR fell but because of the fall itself, that means we’re in for decades more cold war with the risk of a thermonuclear hot one. It’s the Chamberlain Complex: the preferred response among cowards is to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia’s Love Affair with Terror

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

Here’s a hot one: Writing in Asia Times, Federico Bordonaro, “senior analyst” with something called the Power and Interest News Report, exposes the truly outrageous and horrifying nature of Russian support for global terrorism. He also documents the Kremlin’s consolidation of power. And his conclusion? It’s unbelievably this: Russia is only supporting international terrorism because of an inferiority complex engendered by the expansion of NATO. In other words, Russia got its feelings hurt in the 90s, that is why it is supporting global terrorism in the 00s. All we need to do to control these actions by Russia is to strike a “grand bargain” with Putin (you know, the same kind Chamberlain struck with Hitler), showing Russians that we love them and respect their opinions, and then they’ll become civilized. Psychological forces sure are at work here, but Mr. Bordonaro is their victim. It’s so much easier and more comfortable to think of the Putin regime as “misunderstood” than evil, isn’t it? That means all we have to do is be nicer to it and it will be nicer to us. On the other hand, if the Kremlin is dominated by a clan of crazed KGB functionaires steeped in hatred of the west and yearning for revenge not because of what happened after the USSR fell but because of the fall itself, that means we’re in for decades more cold war with the risk of a thermonuclear hot one. It’s the Chamberlain Complex: the preferred response among cowards is to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia’s Love Affair with Terror

September 1, 2006 · 6 Comments

Here’s a hot one: Writing in Asia Times, Federico Bordonaro, “senior analyst” with something called the Power and Interest News Report, exposes the truly outrageous and horrifying nature of Russian support for global terrorism. He also documents the Kremlin’s consolidation of power. And his conclusion? It’s unbelievably this: Russia is only supporting international terrorism because of an inferiority complex engendered by the expansion of NATO. In other words, Russia got its feelings hurt in the 90s, that is why it is supporting global terrorism in the 00s. All we need to do to control these actions by Russia is to strike a “grand bargain” with Putin (you know, the same kind Chamberlain struck with Hitler), showing Russians that we love them and respect their opinions, and then they’ll become civilized. Psychological forces sure are at work here, but Mr. Bordonaro is their victim. It’s so much easier and more comfortable to think of the Putin regime as “misunderstood” than evil, isn’t it? That means all we have to do is be nicer to it and it will be nicer to us. On the other hand, if the Kremlin is dominated by a clan of crazed KGB functionaires steeped in hatred of the west and yearning for revenge not because of what happened after the USSR fell but because of the fall itself, that means we’re in for decades more cold war with the risk of a thermonuclear hot one. It’s the Chamberlain Complex: the preferred response among cowards is to stick your head in the sand and hope for the best.

Categories: russia

Neo-Soviet Russia is Creepily Becoming a Holy Fascist Empire

September 1, 2006 · Leave a Comment

It appears that Neo-Soviet Russia will replace the communist ideological element of Sovietism with, ironically, religion. No sooner did Neo-Soviet Russia block all non-Russian Christians from broadcasting on Russian radio waves than it announced that Orthodox Russian Christianity will soon be taught in Russian schools (Hitler was also a great fan of religion as a political weapon). As RIA Novosti reports:

The teaching of Orthodox Christianity in public schools will hurt Jews and other minorities in Russia, a Russian Jewish leader has said. Berel Lazar, one of Russia’s two chief rabbis, was quoted Wednesday by JTA as saying in an interview with a Moscow radio station that the introduction in four Russian regions of a new subject called the “Foundations of Russian Orthodox Culture” will “divide children into different classes” and ostracize minorities. Russian Muslims have also been reported to criticize the new subject that will become obligatory in certain regions of central Russia starting Friday. The curriculum change was first reported Wednesday.Russia is a multi-confessional state with the Russian Orthodox Church seen as the most popular religion. Other religions include Islam, Protestantism, Judaism, Buddhism and a number of less popular confessions.

Categories: russia